Monday, May 23, 2011
County Parks Master Plan meeting set May 26 in Wimberley
Plan nears completion with final meeting set for June 30
Send your comments and questions to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Hauff (below), check in with your commissioners or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story. County Judge Cobb and Commissioners at bert.cobb@co.hays.tx.us;Pct. 1 Debbie Ingalsbe, debbiei@co.hays.tx.us; Pct. 2 Mark Jones, mark.jones@co.hays.tx.us; Pct. 3 Will Conley, will.conley@co.hays.tx.us; Pct. 4 Ray Whisenant, ray.whisenant@co.hays.tx.us
Hays County Courthouse, San Marcos, TX – Hays County is continuing to gather input for its Parks, Open Space & Natural Areas Master Plan by holding its fourth public meeting to review a conceptual blueprint, alternatives and implementation mechanisms for a draft plan that when finalized will guide parks and open space development in Hays County for years to come.
The meeting is Thursday, May 26, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at 119 Wood Acre Drive (Jacob’s Well Property Owners’ Association building), Wimberley. A final meeting is scheduled for June 30 in San Marcos.
For more information about the parks master planning process, go to www.co.hays.tx.us/ParksMasterPlan or contact Jeff Hauff, County Grants Administrator, at 512.393.2209 or jeff.hauff@co.hays.tx.us.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Did you mean to say, 109 Wood acre Drive (Woodcreek Property Owners Association building)?
This program was designed to create the appearance of "community" acceptance of plans by a few for the following:
1) mandate of purchase of several hundred thousand acres of private property in Hays County at taxpayer expense
2) conveyance of 100% of any value remaining in the property to various "non profit" organizations.
3) the "survey" was just a tool to try to create rationalization for this plan. There was no integrity in the survey or the manner in which the survey was conducted. Participants who did not want the county purchasing this property were instructed that they simply should not vote. The same folks promoting this scheme would show up at multiple hearings in order to help force the result to the pre-determined outcome.
4) if you think the Jacobs Well area land transactions were scandalous, you might be concerned that the some of the same individuals involved in those deals are quite active in pushing this plan as well.
Wow, this time the WVWA people get to stay at headquarters. They've attended to "vote" at all the other places to. No doubt they'll "vote" again - this stakeholder process is about as corrupt as one might imagine. The outcome is pre-determined and the attendees are just monkeys playing the games sponsored by the hosts of the meeting.
The person who keeps trying to make the word "community" sound like a social disease is nothing but a fool.
I sure hope I don't live next to you.
The word "community" is a disease - much like "sustainability". The word is an excuse for rationalizing the taking of property and individual rights.
Is "community" an identifiable entity? No
Can "community" be a party to a lawsuit? No
Does "community" have a bank account? No
Does "community" have a job? No
Post a Comment