Pages

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Hay County seeks new Precinct 2 building


Note:
The press release was issued yesterday by the county's communications office: laureen.chernow@co.hays.tx.us, office, 512.393.2296


Hays County Courthouse, San Marcos, TX – The Hays County Commissioners Court has authorized its construction project management company, Broaddus & Associates, to request bids for design of a new Precinct 2 office after rental and purchase spaces were determined to be inadequate and incompatible for operations or outside of the Justice of the Peace precinct boundaries.

City of Kyle Mayor Lucy Johnson recently appeared before the Court to remind officials that the City intends to reclaim its property at 111 N. Front Street for use as an expanded Police Department facility as soon as summer 2012. The County has rented that building to house Precinct 2 offices since 2007, with the understanding it was on a temporary basis.

“Hays County appreciates the partnership we have with the City of Kyle, and respects the city’s need to use its own office space,” said Precinct 2 Commissioner Mark Jones. “Both jurisdictions recognize the need for us to move – the City so it can effectively use space it owns, and the County so it can accommodate the services it is providing for an increased population in the Kyle and Buda areas.”

In the new building the County needs to accommodate offices for the Precinct 2 Commissioner, Constable and Justice of the Peace, along with a courtroom, Sheriff’s Office substation, Adult Probation services and an enlarged Tax Assessor-Collector’s space that would include the office now located in Buda. The County is investigating the possibility of a land swap with the City of Kyle – the County would get property on Kohler’s Crossing near the Plum Creek subdivision as well as some cash, and the City would get County-owned property on Rebel Drive that currently houses the Precinct 2 Constable’s Office.

“We are more than bulging at the seams in our Precinct 2 and Constable’s Precinct 5 offices,” Jones said. “If we can make this work out, the Constable’s office in Buda would get back space it needs when the tax office moves out. At times there is a long line out the door awaiting tax services there, and that problem should go away by consolidating that office into the new building.”

Jones noted the difficulty in finding existing office space – 13- to 15-thousand square feet – in Precinct 2 that could be leased or purchased. “Our offices have to be in Precinct 2 and as County government we’re here long-term,” Jones said, “Given the current low interest rates and construction costs versus rents in the $1- to $1.15-per-square-foot range, it probably makes sense anyway to own rather than rent. We’ll know more when we get the initial cost information we’ve requested.”

1 comment:

Peter Stern said...

I spoke with Commissioner Mark Jones last week. I appreciate the time he provided. He seems like a nice guy who has some good business experience and a good sense of humor, which is sure to help him in the long haul of his office terms.

We seem to agree on many issues, but we differ slightly re: the building of an office site in Precinct 2 at this time.

Comm. Jones sees it as a good opportunity to eliminate rental expense and to take advantage of current building costs, which are certain to escalate in the future.

Normally I would agree fully with him; however, as I told Comm. Jones, it is not a good idea to increase expenditures during these critical economic times, except for emergency reasons. It makes no sense to add to the existing and significant long term county debt.

Comm. Jones has some good points about selling some property as well, to deter some of the costs.

I really think he makes a lot of sense, IF WE WERE IN GOOD ECONOMIC TIMES.

Fact: More Hays County residents are unemployed than ever before and many are having problem paying their monthly living expenses.

Fact: There are more county home foreclosures than in any previous time in Hays County's history.

Fact: The road bond package provides the county with a means to develop and improve our roadways, yet it does so with a significant long term debt.

We are told that the agreement with TxDOT ensures that the agency repays 80 percent of the total for the road improvement, BUT it may take 1 or more decades for the agency to do so, even with state backing.

Furthermore, the state is hurting financially as well and there is absolutely no real guarantee what-so-ever that the Hays County will indeed recover the money promised. What if the state decides it hasn't the dollars available?

Anyway, homeowners will continue see small increases in their taxes most likely for the next dozen years, with the bond package, annual district building and/or land value increases, along with other bond issues (perhaps for new school buildings as the population increases) and we may even be see one or more small tax rate increases.

Hays County residents simply canNOT be expected to continue to bear the burden of ongoing and escalating county expenditures. Simply stated it is not fair and it is not the right thing to do.

Yes, roads need improving. Yes, our county government needs better and larger office space. Most of us realize that.

However, fiscal conservatism must be practiced expecially during these critical economic times and our leaders need to recognize that.