Pages

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

It's time to stop US corporate tax schemes


Ironically, the Tea Party looked like they were going to be the real deal – using leftist civil disobedience strategies to try and forge a more “true conservative” populace America. But sadly, instead of recreating Norman Rockwell, they ended up creating a 21st century version of George Lincoln Rockwell


Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Boschert at
arrowbiz@texasorp.com or click on the "comments" button at the bottom of the story

By Rocky Boschert
Financial Editor

Do you know you pay more money in taxes than many huge well-known U.S. corporations? In fact, the 10 bucks in your pocket is more than many of the largest corporations paid in U.S. taxes in 2009, including Bank of America, Verizon, General Electric, Boeing, and Citigroup. Other companies like Federal Express and ExxonMobil pay effective tax rates of less than 10 percent (even though the “official” corporate tax rate is 35%).

To insult middle class workers even more, these same companies pay their CEOs and top managers $ millions a year in salary and perks – and spend millions lobbying a grateful United States Congress for preferential tax and socially irresponsible regulatory leniency. The Republican Party politicians seem to be the biggest campaign and corporate lobby money whores, but the Democrats are certainly not walking away from the pig’s influential feeding trough.

In what should be a massive public outcry, corporate tax dodgers are taking money directly out of the pockets of middle class workers – which severely hurts the American economy and its citizens. Corporations use foreign tax havens and loopholes to siphon money and jobs offshore - while not paying their fair share of domestic taxes for US infrastructure, public services and the educational investments they directly exploit to achieve their huge profits.

The truth is we would NOT be broke at the federal, state, or county level – IF the politicians would actually represent the people who voted for them. It is a rage-inducing fact that lobby money corrupted politicians are actually helping the rich and the Wall Street corporate elite to drain state and federal budgets (hence, county and city budgets) by giving US multinational corporations huge tax breaks and allowing them to dodge taxes through overseas tax havens.

Here is how the scam works. The average effective U.S. corporate tax rate – the amount of tax corporations actually pay – ends up being far lower than the 35 percent the whining free markets ideologues tout. Thanks to the widespread use by many companies of hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks, and because the earnings of many firms are reported on individual, rather than corporate returns, the U.S. raises very little tax revenue from many huge US corporations.

Most relevant, many American multinationals shift most income to low-tax countries. And it turns out that more than half of taxable business income in the U.S. is earned by tax advantaged pass-through companies such as partnerships and S corporations that are set up by the multinationals as lower rate tax havens. These “shell” pass-through business entities then pay lower individual tax rates on this income – but owe no corporate tax at all.

Additionally, corporate tax dodgers hurt smaller responsible U.S. businesses that have to compete unfairly against legal corporate tax “cheats.” A domestic U.S. business that pays its share of taxes honestly because it can’t afford a huge cadre of tax attorneys and lobbyists is at a distinct competitive disadvantage with big corporations that game the system and shift profits to foreign tax havens.

Yes, states are facing the worst budget gaps in living memory – with estimates of combined budget gaps in all U.S. states of over $100 billion. But if we just closed overseas tax havens – even while continuing to allow favorable domestic tax write-offs – it would generate an estimated $100 billion-plus of US tax revenue. And if we made the corporate tax dodgers pay their fair share of taxes we wouldn’t have to make anywhere near the cuts to state and county budgets that particularly punish senior citizens and victimize children.

The combined “legal” tax evasion of both wealthy individuals and multinational corporations deny the US Treasury between $125 billion and $150 billion a year. Hence, responsible US business owners and struggling individual taxpayers have to pick up the slack to pay for the infrastructure and services all of us are privileged to use – including many US transnationals domiciled in the US that make $ billions a year in profits.

It's telling that in the 1950s, a third of federal revenue came from corporate income taxes. By 2009, it has declined to 10 percent. Every year increasingly profitable US multinational corporations are paying fewer taxes – and middle class individuals and smaller businesses are paying more and more taxes.

Examples of Corporate Tax Dodgers

BANK OF AMERICA didn’t pay a single penny in federal income taxes in 2009. They argue this is because they lost money. Yet Bank of America gave $5.184 million to political campaigns and paid CEO Thomas Montag $29 million in 2009.

BOEING CORPORATION: Over the three year period from 2008 to 2010 had total pre-tax profits of $9.7 billion but did not pay a dime of its profits in federal taxes. Boeing Corporation has 38 subsidiaries in foreign tax haven jurisdictions.

VERIZON: Take out your Verizon phone bill. See the part of the bill where you paid a few dollars in taxes? Guess what? You paid more taxes on your monthly phone bill than Verizon paid in 2009. They reported $24.2 billion in pre-tax U.S. income, and yet “somehow” claimed a federal corporate refund of $1.3 billion.

GENERAL ELECTRIC: Between 2006 and 2010, General Electric told their shareholders they had $26.3 billion in profits, but paid no U.S. taxes.

EXXON-MOBIL: The Texas-based oil giant uses offshore subsidiaries and other loopholes, paying no US taxes whatsoever in 2009. Yet somehow ExxonMobil did come up with $68 million to lobby Congress between 2008 and 2010.

WELLS FARGO: Wells Fargo escaped paying any federal taxes in 2009 by writing all of its losses off after its acquisition of Wachovia. Yet the CEO saw a salary of $5.6 million paid in cash and stock awards of more than $13 million.

So the next time you hear some politician – or some think tank or budget group – say we have a spending problem and not a revenue problem, they are simply exacerbating the problem. The bottom line is this: If you want to solve our enormous national, state, and county budget crises, institute a fair tax on the rich and their corporate cousins (the richest 10% of Americans own 70% of all outstanding US stocks and bonds) – and get rid of our wasteful and outdated military empire around the world.

It’s time we have our own really effective revolution here in America – where we force the monopolistic two-party economic system to relinquish their breast-feeding corporate welfare state. Ironically, the Tea Party looked like they were going to be the real deal – using leftist civil disobedience strategies to try and forge a more “true conservative” populace America. But sadly, instead of recreating Norman Rockwell, they ended up creating a 21st century version of George Lincoln Rockwell.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well said!

Anonymous said...

One sided Liberal speak!

TR said...

It's no secret that the wealthy and corporations are coddled by politicians and favored by the government at the expense of the working class and small business. Question is, when will it all end? Wasn't one of Obama's campaign promises to shut down offshore tax havens? And hasn't it been the Republicans who have stood in his way, same with Big Bank and Wall Street regulation?

Anonymous said...

Thank you for finally bringing this information to light.

Rocky Boschert said...

Anonymous March 31, 2:27 PM says:

"One sided Liberal speak!"

Well, what is the other side right wing speak?

Give us the rationalization of a free markets ideologue that justifies multi-billion dollar profit corporations not paying any taxes when everyone else is hurting and watching needed programs get cut because our nation at all levels of government have no revenues to continue operating at anywhere near humane levels.

What is your solution so we can all know what to do? We await your wisdom?

Rocky B. said...

TR,

Please give us examples of how the Republicans tried to get in the way of Obama's broken campaign promises to 1) rein in Wall Street, 2) make corporations pay their fair share of taxes, and 3) prosecute those Wall Street criminals who are still sitting "unemployed" or retired with millions of bonus and company severance money?

I simply see the Republicans doing nothing but going back to the extreme W. Bush anti-regulatory stance. Show me how I am wrong.

In my opinion, at the federal level, when it comes to making corporations act responsibly, there is really no longer any difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. They are both addicted to corporate brown nosing.

I suggest everyone rent the recent documentary "Inside Job." It pretty much tells the story.

Anonymous said...

Rocky:
Common sense is one thing that I think seems to be lacking in most debates these days. I have read your articles and sometimes agree and sometimes disagree. However, this article is pretty straightforward in it's statement, which if true (not saying they're not but I'm a believer in fact checking sources), means that something is seriously broken.

I would add that the $125 to 150 billion that you say is not collected from corporate income tax is a drop in the bucket when compared to the billions in wasted money that also needs scrubbing from the federal budget. The strict enforcement of the tax code of 35%, the closure of tax loopholes, and spending restraint is how the budget crisis will be fixed.

You are right that it's not a Republican problem only. It would seem that both parties want to "brown-nose" with the corporate types for perks in return for reduced tax burdens, but at the same time fail in reigning in out of control spending. If we are out of control locally as Sam Brannon and others say, then I think an equally loud outcry from the Left is needed regarding out of control federal spending, just as your article is a cry against out of control social welfare for corporations.

Lastly, I think that the comment made earlier by one responder against the free market is misdirected. In a truly free market ALL parties would have the same tax breaks, not just the large corporations. So either we need to eliminate the tax loopholes for the large corporations or make the playing field level by making the exemptions available for all. Or better yet, just get rid of the complex tax code and have simplified rates. If it's 35% for corporations, than it's 35% - period no matter the size of your corporation.

It's time for common sense to reign in these discussions.

Rocky B. said...

Anonymous April 2, 7:23 AM:

How satisfying it is to read such an intelligent and thoughtful response to my article (especially at 7:23 am Saturday morning). I commend your effort.

The only point I can add to your great analysis is that I also think the 35% corporate tax rate is too high. I believe in "business parity" for small businesses - and a 35% tax rate would way too be too high for the sole proprietor and "partnership" American businesses that are the backbone of the American free enterprise system.

So I agree with you; maybe a flat tax rate of 20% for the major corporations domiciled in the United States - with no ability to use offshore scams or lower tax rate passthrough subsidiaries.

Then, and it gets more complicated here, sole proprietors and partnerships pay a flat 10% on all income under $1 million and 20% on all income over $1 million (after salaries, benefits, mortgages and leases, i.e. "operating expenses.")
ai like the idea that the first $1 million is taxed at 10% due to their weakened competitive position via "big corp."

In my view, we are dangerously seeing more and more duopolies dominate the business sectors ( Verizon and ATT, WalMart and Costco, 4 banks hold 70% of all American financial assets, etc.), and they should not have an undue competive advantage - without some "payment" for that advantage.

Of course, Americans seem to be now more about convenience than fair competitiveness, so anti-monopoly sentiment is almost non-existent (also a big problem, but a story for another article).

The bottom line is this: If American companies don't want to pay their "fair share" of taxes to support the 1) US infrastructure they use, 2) the US natural resources they exploit, and 3) the US education system they tap for lower and lower wage employees, then they should not be allowed to do business in this country without a "usage" payment of some sort.

And if they don't want to "pay", let these companies sell their products to the citizens of the foreign countries that they get their cheap labor and their scam tax breaks from.

Anyway, getting an intelligent response like yours is the main reason I try to share my ideas in this Blog - even though the locals seem to think I am a progressive socialist professional investing hypocrite (and how dare them call me a socialist).

Thanks so much for your thoughts. You should consider writing articles for the Roundup. The community needs all the help it can get.

Anonymous said...

The author is obviously an anti-corporation liberal. Truth is, politicians created the tax laws. Tax policy is influenced by special interests representing not only corporations but also unions and other liberal interests. To single out profit-oriented corporations shows the author's bias and totally negates his credibility.

Rocky Boschert said...

Anonymous April 4, 4:12 PM states:

"The author is obviously an anti-corporation liberal."

and:

"Tax policy is influenced by special interests representing not only corporations but also unions and other liberal interests."

Since labor unions now only control 7% of the American workforce, who exactly are these other ominous and dangerous "liberal interests" that are supposedly exploiting the US tax system?

By "liberal interests" - do you mean those "socialist" retirees living on social security?

Or do you mean those "communist" senior citizens who rely on Medicare?

Or do you mean those "welfare children" American soldiers who fought in your wars who now need physical and mental health assistance for the limbs they lost and the stress traumas they and their families live with?

Or do you mean those military-industrial-energy corporations who made $Billions on government borrowed tax money - which put us trillions of dollars in debt - just to start a war based on lies in Iraq and a failing 10 year war in Afghanistan?

Sir, instead of throwing out meaningless right wing talking points, please give the readers specific examples of who those tax sucking "liberal interests" are.

I find it very interesting how the right wing free markets ideologues throw out their vacuous talking points - but have a very difficult time bringing in facts or substantiation to prove their ideas as valid?

Yes, I am biased, but I have established my credibility with facts in my article. Where is your credible data?

In fact, last Anonymous, I believe I am a truer free markets advocate than you are. Why? It's very simple. Because I am a very successful small business owner who loathes corporate welfare and is willing to pay taxes for the privilege of success this nation has given me.

I also loathe the hypocritical left and more often right wing politicians who, in fact, steal tax dollars that should be used for infrastructure, children's education, retired seniors and the downtrodden - and give it to their elite and rich corporate masters.

Using your labels, Sir, I think that makes me a fiscal conservative on the one hand - and a compassionate liberal on the other.

Where do you stand, Sir? And give us facts that can justify your story. I'm sure we all would like to hear it. And remember, your credibility is at stake.

jwigginsburns said...

All I know is, I am infuriated when I pay my tax bill (and it was a whopper this year), and then learn of corporations (GE) who paid NOTHING! I agree that 35% is too much. It's too much for corporations, and too much for me.

The Man Behind the Mask said...

Rocky, you said...

“Since labor unions now only control 7% of the American workforce, who exactly are Since labor unions now only control 7% of the American workforce, who exactly are these other ominous and dangerous "liberal interests" that are supposedly exploiting the US tax system? that are supposedly exploiting the US tax system?”

I think your “7%” is a bit low, it’s more like 12% and most of the Union workers in the US work for Government! BTW most all of us, conservative and liberal alike, are sucking on the Government teat in one way or the other. We asked for it and we got it. Every time a problem surfaces we look to Washington to help us out. That’s not what government is for but we allowed it to change.