Pages

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Little known agency has plans to pipe groundwater into Hays County


Note:
Barbara Hopson is a Hays County resident and retired educator. She also has a real knack for reporting. While researching water issues, she stumbled upon this little known agency operating virtually in our back yard. They have big plans to import groundwater from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer that lies beneath neighboring Caldwell and Gonzalez counties. Get to know the name. One day you may be paying your water bill to the HCPUA. We appreciate Ms. Hopson's willingness to share the news.

This may be coincidence, but just above the HCPUA area on their map graphic, a new Municipal Utility District is being considered. Just days ago our State Rep. Jason Isaac introduced HB 3813 to create the Oatman Hill MUD in northern Caldwell County, in what looks like that NW corner. The MUD would be 1,380 acres approximately.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Ms. Hopson at
hopsonbarbara@yahoo.com or click on the "comments" button at the bottom of the page

By Barbara Hopson
Special to the RoundUp

I'd never heard of the Hays Caldwell Public Utility Agency (HCPUA) until yesterday. Right now it is of interest mostly to San Marcos, Kyle, and Buda, but we in Wimberley may be buying (expensive) water from HCPUA or from one of its participants one day.

Map of HCPUA members/Click to enlarge
HCPUA was formed in January 2007, and there is nothing Machiavellian about its formation. It was a matter of three cities and three water suppliers getting together to mutually assure their future water needs. They hope not to depend on anyone else for water. General manager of the project, Graham Moore, was quoted last June that the HCPUA was the only one in the state.

HCPUA cannot impose a tax, but it can issue bonds and apparently plans to do so. (In summer 2010 they were advertising for a bond counsel service. Presumably they now have one.)

HCPUA would get its water from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer beneath NE Caldwell and NW Gonzales counties. A 45-mile pipeline would bring the water from the pumping site to Kyle – if the Gonzales County Underwater Groundwater Conservation District gives a pumping permit.

HCPUA is already buying right of way for the pipeline. The project will cost over $120 million. Kyle will pay more than $34 million for its share in the project. That city wants to sell water to other communities to help pay its own bond debt for the pipeline.

Coincidentally, the Hays County Water and Wastewater Plan (accepted by Hays County Commissioners Court in Feb. 2011) mentions a Kyle-Wimberley pipeline as a possible source of imported water for Wimberley.

The pipeline would travel along FM 3237 to the edge of Wimberley. It's unclear what city or agency would pay for construction of that pipeline. The water that came from Kyle would be expensive, but as the water suppliers are saying now, "There ain't no more cheap water. Deep wells and pipelines are very expensive." The first phase of the pipeline to Kyle is slated to come on line in 2015.

An alternative for Wimberley to buying water from Kyle would be to buy it from San Marcos (also mentioned in the Hays County Plan). A private consortium, Sustainable Water Resources (SWR), wants to build a $500 million pipeline from the part of the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer northeast of Austin (Simsboro formation in Bastrop County), all the way to Schertz (San Antonio). An offshoot of that pipeline, to San Marcos, is planned. Wimberley could buy water from HCPUA (at Kyle or at San Marcos) or from SWR – whichever could get the water to Wimberley first, all other things being equal.

The next meeting of the HCPUA Board of Directors is Wednesday, March 23 at 3 p.m. at Kyle City Hall, 100 W. Center Street. The San Marcos City Council will hear a report from Kim Porterfield (SM Council member & Vice Chair of HPCUA) on Thursday night, March 24 in San Marcos.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is good news and I congratulate the cities of Buda, Kyle and San Marcos for planning for their future growth rather than sticking their heads in the sand as some in the Wimberley Valley continue to do. Planning and securing ROWs now will save money and help prevent bidding wars when more water is needed.

Anonymous said...

Item 15 on the agenda for the
Feb. 23, 2011 meeting of HCPUA was:
"Consider Adoption of Resolution
appealing the Desired Future
Conditions adopted in Groundwater
Management Area 13." Caldwell and
Gonzales counties are in GMA 13.
HCPUA wants to ensure that GMA 13
will allow them sufficient water
drawdown when they plan to start
sending groundwater through the
pipeline.

Item 16 at that same meeting was
"Consider adoption of Resolution forming a Litigation Committee."
HCPUA evidently anticipates lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

Item 15 on the agenda for the
Feb. 23, 2011 meeting of HCPUA was:
"Consider Adoption of Resolution
appealing the Desired Future
Conditions adopted in Groundwater
Management Area 13." Caldwell and
Gonzales counties are in GMA 13.
HCPUA wants to ensure that GMA 13
will allow them sufficient water
drawdown when they plan to start
sending groundwater through the
pipeline.

Item 16 at that same meeting was
"Consider adoption of Resolution forming a Litigation Committee."
HCPUA evidently anticipates lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

My bet is a pipeline from San Marcos to Wimberley will win out.
A Kyle pipeline wouldn't benefit
the RR 12 "Conley Glory Road" from
San Marcos to Wimberley, or benefit
Conley's land developer patrons.

Smell the coffee said...

Conley and his developer buddies are winning this battle hands down. Why else would the commissioners court members argue so strenuously at their budget workshop yesterday to keep pushing forward with their road bond projects.

Debt? What debt?

Conley's got the whole court wrapped around his little finger. All 5-0 votes with nary a dissenting voice. Cobb repeatedly deferred to the real Judge on the court, Conley.

Hold on to your pocketbooks. This is a super charged developer special interest court. Even the county's bond counsel admitted that road bonds are more lucrative when the road projects come with development potential. I think it would be interesting to see the verbiage in these bonds when they're packaged up and put out for sale on the market.

Safety may be the public line and overlying motivation (and some are desperately needed) but the underlying agenda is development. Who do they think they're kidding?

Anonymous said...

Disharmony may be brewing (Heh, heh - a nod to "Smell the coffee"
above) in Hays Caldwell Public
Utility Agency. Canyon Regional
Water Authority (CRWA) is one of the water supplier members of that
agency, and this is an item from
CRWA's agenda for a meeting on
Jan. 10, 20ll: "Item 10 Consideration...and possible action
to protest the Hays Caldwell Public
Utility Agency and the Texas Water
Alliance applications to the
Gonzales Underground Water District."

CRWA is a member of HCPUA, but
CRWA -- independently of HCPUA --
has water projects of its own that
it wants to be sure are given
permits from Gonzales Underground
Water District (which will have to
permit the proposed HCPUA pupmping
from Gonzales County to Kyle).

Just shows you how savage the
water wars are, folks. Here we
have supposed allies squabbling.

Anonymous said...

This is good news? Depleting water resources from one of the largest food producing counties in the United States is not good news. So fill your swimming pools, water your St. Augustine, build your golf courses,add a hundred more zero lot line subdivisions,suck the Hays Trinity aquifer dry but forget about eating. Gonzales County has no more water to pipe. The Carrizo-Wilcox in Gonzales is already over-allocated to outside sources. This is bad planning at best and pure greed in reality.

Growth in the I-35 corridor and Texas Hill Country is not sustainable. This is about developers' and water purveyors' insatiable greed.

Tired of Right Mean said...

This Blog has become Right Wing Goober Central.

All of a sudden "growth" and "debt" are at odds with each other. What happened to "debt" fears when the local economy and the special interest "corporate" welfare giveaways were humming? Conley was your boy then. But now he is a puppet of the "Wimberley Valley hippies" and the "spineless" county commissioners."

You follower right wingers can't make up your mind which end is up anymore. So you make up your mean-spirited rants at the next opportunity and unload your anger at the world for leaving you behind.

It's kind of like the national and state Republican Party; they wait and see what Obama thinks - and then they automatically say the opposite. They don't have an original thought in their hypocritical hate filled minds - except failed policies from the 1070s.

What a bunch of pathetic pansies you conservatives are.

Anonymous said...

@Anon March 23 at 7:55 pm

Typical falsehoods and exaggerations from another C.A.R.D. member ... maybe even their Member and Poster Boy, Ed Pope currently running for Dist. 2 of the HTGCD. I would have however, expected him to use his real name and show some character, but you never know about that bunch. Whether it is Ed Pope or not, the commenter used most all of C.A.R.D.’s talking points. I can’t wait for the candidates debates to take place.

Anonymous said...

does the name Porterfield (Kim) ring a bell?

Barbara Hopson said...

UPDATE:

Phase 1 of the Hays Caldwell Public
Utility Agency pipeline is now planned to go from NE Caldwell County to 5 miles NE of San Marcos -- not to Kyle --, and water
will start through the pipeline in
2018. For more info, see
www.regionltexas.org (that's
Region L).

There is at least one other Utility
Agency in the state now. Brushy
Creek Regional Utility Authority serves Cedar Park, Leander, and Round Rock (www.bcrua.org).

Anonymous said...

to Anon 9:01 AM:

Ed Pope is running for Place 4 (not 2) in the HTGCD election on May 14.

The Candidates Forum of the League
of Women Voters-Wimberley Valley
will be Monday, April 18, at 7 p.m.

Barbara Hopson said...

UPDATE #2:

In July 2009 the Texas Water Development Board voted $182 for a
Brushy Creek Regional Utility
Authority project, and do apparently TWDB could be a source of funds for the HCPUA pipeline
also.

Barbara Hopson said...

UPDATE #2:

That's "$182 MILLION," not $182.
Sorry!

Anonymous said...

Rep. Jason Isaac and Sen. Jeff
Wentworth have filed (March 11) identical bills in the Legislature
concerning public utility agencies
(such as Hays Caldwell Public
Utility Agency)

You might visit www.legis.state.tx.us to read the
bills (HB 3620, SB 1596) to see
whether you find anything troublesome in them.

Barbara Hopson said...

What I've written about water pipelines is mere reporting of
pipelines, and possible pipelines,
in the works. I personally do not
think that expensive pipelines are
the best solution, nor do I think
it is fair to deprive Bastrop (for
example) of groundwater they say
they will need for their own use.

Some people may say, "Well, let's pipe in surface water -- not groundwater." The sad fact is that
most of the state River Authorities have already permitted
all the surface water they have
under their purview. That definitely is true of Guadalupe
Blanco River Authority.

We MUST turn to conservation and to
rainwater harvesting.

Anonymous said...

This is a typical approach to surface water in the Woodcreeks and Wimberley. If you didn’t already know, they use the claim that we are running out of groundwater as a ruse to prevent growth. If you suggest surface water to be piped in they show their true colors and want to stop that. Tell the truth Barbara, it’s not about the cost or scarcity; you just don’t want more people in the So-called Wimberley Valley or “bio region” as some in your tribe call it.

Anonymous said...

Here's a simple analogy:

Let's say a big round washtub sitting outdoors represents all the water in our Trinity Aquifer.
Now stick straws (which represent
the farmers/ranchers, households,
and businesses sucking up that
water) into the tub. ALREADY we
have enough straws stuck in the tub to suck out more water each year than the amount of water that falls from the sky to keep the
tub filled. In other words, we're already on track to deplete our aquifer. You can understand how much sooner we will run out of aquifer water if thousands of more straws are stuck into the tub each year.

No one is PREVENTING people from
moving to Hays County or to any
other place. But must they move here in such a way as to take limited water away from the
people who are already here? We
can tell them, truthfully, that
there's not enough water for them,
and that if they want to live here,
they will have to agree to have
rainwater collection incorporated
into the homes they build. Land
developers should be required to
install rainwater collection in
every home or business they construct.

Look, those newcomers are going to
pony up the money one way or the
other: either they can use rainwater or they (and all of us
who are already here) can pay
outrageous amounts of money for
piped-in groundwater (if there is
a GCD that will permit the water to
be ferried to us). And, again, there is NO surface water to be had.(I think Canyon Lake has now
reached its limit on exporting
water. If they haven't, San
Antonio is gunning for rights to
every drop. The San Marcos River
has already permitted all its
water.)