Even the least interested citizen knows when election season has arrived by the avalanche of junk mail that starts pouring into the mailbox. These colorful mail outs were collected at one residence inside a two week period. Whew! The mind wanders through fruitless attempts to compute all the time, ink, money and trees that go into producing them . . . then to that poor postal carrier who has to lug 'em around to everybody's mailboxes. What are we supposed to do with them all!? Are the best candidates the ones with the most mailers with pretty pictures, or are they the ones with the biggest campaign bankrolls and thus suspicious from the get-go? Then we realize that it becomes our responsibility, as good citizens, to recycle every last piece. Well that's just another danged unfunded mandate on the public. Maybe, as an act of civil disobedience, we decide to throw them on the burn pile out back and set all the chemicals adrift into the air we all share and breathe. "Hah ha," we think, "a few of those airborne molecules are sure to drift into the nostrils of those smiling politicians. That'll teach 'em to pollute our air and mailboxes." Lest we blow a fuse, we try not imagining the thousands more political yard signs that will join the mailers on the burn pile. Hope springs eternal, however. There's a lonely candidate out there who has declined to play the political yard sign game. Said he favors less clutter, clean air, and would campaign by e-mail. Now that's a true 21st century candidate, and hopefully the beginning of a trend in our parts. For that alone, he certainly has our support.
–B. Ochoa
7 comments:
I wish I knew who this candidate was. I'm a democrat, and while all those annoying mailers look familiar to me, I haven't received any specific email messages from candidates.
Actually, now that I think about it, I suppose I'd rather continue getting political junk mail than have the wrong candidate get a hold of my private email address. Maybe we should all be careful what we wish for.
The PEC Board recently voted in a policy to allow Board candidates get the members names and home addresses specifically for the purpose of sending us campaign mail. Just what we needed, larry and patrick, more junk mail.
I find it much more irritating that I have been receiving unauthorized political phone calls.
During the past 2 weeks I received at least 10 such calls, which were automated.
Who is this paper-free candidate? I've received numerous mail pieces for each contested Democratic candidate.
The way I see it, the US Postal Service (USPS) is the real problem. They are government whores for all kinds of business and corporate junk mail and political mailings that make them money for their service.
Citizens should be allowed to sign up for a USPS "Do Not Mail" list, prohibiting the USPS from delivering stuff like Scientology brainwashing literature, bogus business solicitations, rip off credit card mailings, etc. that messes up the environment, wastes trees, and adds to land fills unnecessarily.
If we can do it with the telephone solicitors, why can't we do it with the USPS? Where are the pro-Joe Stack anti-government Republicans on this one?
LLB, you can sign up for a "no junk mail" with your local PO.
There are forms to fill out online.
PS Form 1500 (PDF)
Application for Listing and/or Prohibitory Order (2/2009)
PS Form 1583 (PDF)
Application of Delivery of Mail Through Agent (12/2004)
PS Form 1583-A (PDF)
Application to Act as a Commercial Mail Receiving Agency (8/2000)
You may find them at:
http://www.usps.com/forms/appforms.htm
P
There you go again, Peter, making sense and informing the public. Thank you for the information.
Post a Comment