Pages

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Hays County, coalition will get their 290 water line & West Travis water system


Under the terms approved by the Board, LCRA and the coalition have until Jan. 17 to negotiate the purchase and sale agreements


LCRA's Hwy 290 water line serves several thousand
north Hays County
customers and supplies water
to the
Dripping Springs Water Supply Corp.

Note:
The persistence of a coalition of Travis County cities, Hays County and other entities seems to have paid off. We should soon see the details of the sale of the West Travis water system, which includes the Hwy 290/north Hays County water pipeline, to the Coalition of Central Texas UDC. Hays County Commissioner Ray Whisenant, vice president of the coalition's board of directors, has promised that the purchase price and other details involving the 290 system (heretofore shrouded in official negotiating secrecy agreements) will be made public once the ink dries on the sale. If Whisenant makes good on his promise, many other questions hopefully will be answered relating to the county's short & long term plans for the 290 line.

Send your comments and questions to the LCRA at http://www.lcra.org/about/overview/contact.html, to Commissioner Whisenant at
ray.whisenant@co.hays.tx.us, to the CCTUDC at contact@texansforpublicutilities.org, or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

Here's a portion of a press release distributed late last week by the Lower Colorado River Authority.

(Nov. 17, 2011) – LCRA's Board of Directors Wednesday unanimously authorized General Manager Becky Motal to negotiate the sale of the West Travis County Regional Water and Wastewater System to the Coalition of Central Texas Utilities Development Corporation.

Under the terms approved by the Board, LCRA and the coalition have until Jan. 17 to negotiate the purchase and sale agreements.
Service area of the West Travis system
Click on map to enlarge
"The Board's decision represents an opportunity for local communities to exercise their wishes," said Motal. "This decision is in the best interest of the communities served by the West Travis county systems and LCRA."

Wednesday's decision was an important step in LCRA's efforts to sell its retail water and wastewater systems. The Board decided in November 2010 to seek buyers for the systems, pointing out that a water utility made up of multiple systems does not leverage the strengths of LCRA as a regional supplier of raw water and wholesale power.

LCRA purchased and developed community water systems in the Hill Country and along the Colorado River, mostly in the past 10 to 15 years, and has since invested more than $300 million to improve the systems' infrastructure. However, despite cutting costs and raising rates, these systems do not cover their costs and are subsidized by more than $3 million a year.

The Board Wednesday also considered authorizing LCRA to negotiate the sale of 12 systems in the Hill Country and six in LCRA's southeast service area to Corix, an international company that provides service to more than 220 water and wastewater systems that serve 650,000 people in North America.

13 comments:

Not so off base? said...

The LCRA should sell all the water lines to Corix - and in turn Corix should raise the price 20% and sell it to the "Coalition" at inflated prices that are guaranteed to cost the Coalition taxpayers' money.

All in the name of special interest development and crony free markets.

Welcome to the new American way.

shaking my head said...

Problem #1

Have you seen Lake Travis lately?

Problem #2

This will simply convince more people that we have water we don't have.

Problem #3

This water, what there is of it, will cost a fortune.

Why do you think the LCRA wanted to shed all these systems? They were losing massive amounts of money.

We gotta stop talking folks into moving to Dripping Springs and Wimberley, because the land just cannot support so many people.

Anonymous said...

Problem # 4 - Dear Shaking Your Head - Please lead the parade out of town if you wish to move. Otherwise, please shut up. You and all of the other naysayers forget that you've got yours, but don't want others the chance to get theirs (whatever it is they want - better education, the chance to live in the Hill Country, etc.)

where will the water come from to take care of you? The same place it will come from for everyone else. Will it get expensive? Probably, so has gas, but it hasn't stopped people from driving, just smarter about the number of trips, and in some cases changing their driving habits. Maybe the cost or scarcity of water will do the same - change habits making more available for all.

Stagnater said...

I agree with Shakin my head. So how can we do that?

1) Rename Hays County "Tea Party County"

2) Offer Herman Cain a free house. That will keep unemployed women from moving here.

3) Declare Hays County a "liberal free zone". This will make the school districts very weak academically, discouraging future home buyers.

Sounds good to me.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous #4 What's your problem? At the rate Hays County is spending money no one will be able to live here because of the taxes, let alone No Water. LCRA can not sell what they don't have. And yes they will still be selling the water to who ever buys the pipe lines. How much will that cost? If LCRA isn't making money,(losing 3 million a year) then have will anybody make this work,,let alone having our government run it. I thought this whole Tea Party was about getting Government out of the retail Business and less TAXES! KICK

Anonymous said...

Who said LCRA would be selling water to whoever buys the pipelines?

LCRA controls the water and the distribution lines. LCRA was able to get the water for free and charged an amount that was supposed to be tied in some way to the costs of the distribution lines. All that LCRA is selling is the distribution lines...the right to access or draw water does not go with it. LCRA will still control that.

So even though LCRA is being relieved of a significant liability, the new owners of the distribution lines will not likewise be able to obtain the water for free. Moreover, there is no indication that LCRA will be obligated to sell any particular amount of water at all to them.

Very expensive pig in a poke.

Anonymous said...

@ shaking my head 11/20/2011 9:02 PM who said...
Problem #1
Have you seen Lake Travis lately?


What did you expect during a drought? One alternative to surface water is groundwater. Drill a well.

Problem #2
This will simply convince more people that we have water we don't have.


Who is "we"? Aren't the "more people" part of "we" as soon as they move here or buy property here?

Problem #3
This water, what there is of it, will cost a fortune.
Why do you think the LCRA wanted to shed all these systems? They were losing massive amounts of money.


So why do you want to try to force homeowners into being customers of such systems?

We gotta stop talking folks into moving to Dripping Springs and Wimberley, because the land just cannot support so many people.

There are also lots and lots of people that workin in Travis County but have no desire to live in Travis County. So neighboring counties are undesirable places to live for many folk. Other than that, quit spending millions of taxpayer dollars to create parks (Blue Hole, Jacobs Well) that form the facade of a water oasis in the middle of a desert.

Swimmer said...

Blue Hole IS an oasis in the middle of a desert.

We should protect it and enjoy it.

Blue Hole is for swimming in, not sucking dry so some short-sighted developers can turn a quick buck talking people into moving to Wimberley.

A Fair Accounting said...

How many rainwater catchment systems could you install for the amount of money it takes to build (or buy) a water pipeline?

Anonymous said...

Swimmer said... "Blue Hole IS an oasis in the middle of a desert. We should protect it and enjoy it."

Have you not been paying attention? The City of Wimberley has been dumping hundreds of thousands gallons of Groundwater on the newly planted St. Augustine Grass at Blue Hole Park over the last 5 months. The 5 month total is over 700,000 gallons of precious drinking water from the Trinity aquifer during the worst drought in recent memory!

I am still waiting for the outrage from David Baker and Jim McMeans. The silence is deafening. Hypocrites!

To "A Fair Accounting", what rain?
~

Anonymous said...

A Fair Accounting said:

"How many rainwater catchment systems could you install for the amount of money it takes to build (or buy) a water pipeline?"

If I read you correctly, we could install one heck of a lot of rainwater systems.

Moreover, rainwater systems would entail the collection and storage of water, along with the understanding of a limited water supply. This would naturally force thoughtful water conservation.

Surface water is the obvious choice of developer-owned local politicians - so that is the main reason why surface water is trying to be forced on us.

watching and waiting said...

To the kind person who told "shaking my head" to either leave town or shut up, I simply would like to remind that person of the parable dealing with not killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

Worried about Water said...

So the West Travis Public Utility Agency has until January 17 to figure out how to put together the funds to buy the LCRA w/ww properties? Is its solution still to float revenue bonds for the purchases? And are there still too
few users to pay even the interest on the bonds -- let alone pay on the principal?