Pages

Sunday, May 17, 2009

From the Texas Observer: "Silent Springs – Is it too late to save Hill Country water?"


Dry riverbed.

According to the nonprofit watchdog Texans for Public Justice, State Representative Patrick Rose received nearly $300,000 in campaign contributions from real estate interests and developers from 2004 to 2008

"A report on the ’06 drought by Austin hydrologist Raymond Slade warns of the consequences of a far worse drought, which “will cause many more wells to become dry and probably result in many thousands of people in the County to be without water . . . "

Send your comments and news tips to online.editor@valleyspringcomm.net or to http://www.texasobserver.org/comments.php?aid=3047

See the full story in the Texas Observer online: http://www.texasobserver.org/article.php?aid=3047

Editor's Note:
Mr. Wilder attended Wimberley High School


By Forrest Wilder | May 15, 2009 | Features

Sixty feet below the shimmering surface of Jacob’s Well, an artesian spring that for thousands of years has pulsed iridescent blue-green water from the Trinity Aquifer to the surface, a sophisticated instrument measures the spring’s vital signs. The results are beamed almost instantaneously to the Internet.

These days the gauge detects only the thinnest of pulses.

On a hot April afternoon, David Baker, an artist turned conservationist, stands on the limestone lip gazing down into Jacob’s Well. Earlier, Baker had checked the spring flow: an anemic five gallons per second. “At that point, the spring has basically stopped flowing,” he says.

Old-timers recall—and spotty historical data confirm—that the spring used to have enough of a head to jet swimmers back to the surface after they cannonballed in. Today the pulse is barely a dying man’s heartbeat. In 2000, Jacob’s Well stopped flowing for the first time in recorded history.

Its source sapped, Cypress Creek came to a trickle in Wimberley, and the state added it to a list of streams with impaired water quality. “I think it was a big wake-up call for the community,” Baker says. “If the well is the canary in the coal mine for the aquifer, then the canary was choking and about dead.”

The spring ceased flowing again in October 2008. As this story went to press, it appeared Jacob’s Well had gone to zero a third time.

The cessations confirm what water experts have been warning: that Jacob’s Well is under immense stress from a development boom over the Trinity Aquifer, the primary source of water for much of the Hill Country.

The trouble is hardly limited to Jacob’s Well or the Hill Country. Groundwater scarcity is a looming crisis across Texas. Because of drought, overpumping, and the loss of natural recharge, state water planners estimate that groundwater available for pumping will decrease 22 percent by 2060. The state’s laissez-faire water laws and cumbersome regulatory apparatus have done little to help.

Conservationists see bad omens in what’s happening to Jacob’s Well and the Trinity Aquifer. Water is particularly fragile in the Hill Country, designated by the state in 1990 as a priority groundwater management area. In no other region of the state, perhaps, are groundwater and surface water so closely intertwined. The science is clear: If the aquifers decline, they take the springs, seeps, streams, rivers, and lakes with them.

“By continuing to increase our use of groundwater, we cut off the lifeblood of the Hill Country,” says Laura Marbury, a water policy specialist with the Environmental Defense Fund of Texas. “We’re trading off increased development for the flow of the creeks and rivers out there. And payback will be harsh.”

Jacob’s Well is tucked in an out-of-the-way corner of a semideveloped subdivision near the Hill Country burg of Wimberley, a one-time backwater of cedar-choppers and hardscrabble ranchers that's now giving way to suburbanization. No signs mark its location. I attended Wimberley High School for four years, visiting Jacob’s Well a handful of times, and still had a hard time finding it. As a sort of omphalos of the region, Jacob’s Well is not so much forgotten as obscured.

Its importance is undeniable, though. Locally, the spring provides the bulk of flow for Cypress Creek, an exquisite, bald cypress-lined stream that forms Blue Hole, one of the state’s top swimming holes. It was saved from residential development by the village of Wimberley and a local philanthropist in 2003.

“Jacob’s Well is Cypress Creek,” Baker says.

Cypress Creek, in turn, feeds the Blanco River—a shallow, flash-flood-prone stream with a fluted limestone bottom and majestic white bluffs flanking mostly undeveloped ranch land. During the drought of record in the '50s, Jacob’s Well kept the Blanco from drying up below Wimberley. The Blanco flows into the San Marcos River, which itself meets the Guadalupe River near Gonzales and rolls down to San Antonio Bay.

Conservationists and water experts stress the wondrous interconnectivity of surface and groundwater in Texas, especially in the porous Hill Country. Consider: At certain leaky spots, the upper Blanco disappears underground, slipping into the aquifer via a fault. The river may even follow the fault lines (geologists aren’t sure) east to the Cypress Creek watershed, providing flow to Jacob’s Well, which in turn pushes water into Cypress Creek and the Blanco River. Downstream, the Blanco River again “loses” water to the aquifer.

Adding to the system’s complexity, some of that Trinity water—about 64,000 acre-feet per year—moves underground into the Balcones Fault Zone portion of the Edwards Aquifer, the source of the perennial San Marcos Springs. Those springs are the headwaters of the San Marcos River, a main source for the Guadalupe River in times of drought.

Texas water law recognizes very little of this. As a drop of water moves between the ground and the surface, it passes through two different legal spheres. As surface water, it’s owned by the state but perhaps allocated, in the form of a water right, to a rancher, farmer, or city. As groundwater, it’s the property of the landowner.

Jacob’s Well confuses this artificial distinction. The spring is not just a headwater; it’s literally a spy hole into the Trinity Aquifer. Divers have mapped the underwater cave over a mile underground, pushing through a series of chambers deep into the limestone Cow Creek formation of the Middle Trinity. Eight have died in the pursuit of the unknown.

“Jacob’s Well is the expression of the aquifer on the surface,” Baker says. “What it’s indicating to us is that the whole system is stressed.”

Recent research suggests that Jacob’s Well is highly sensitive to pumping, especially in the recharge zone northwest of the springs, an area of small sinkholes (believed to connect to Jacob’s Well) and cedar-choked hills that developers are carving into residential lots. The main development is called The Ridge at Wimberley Springs.

“I think we’ve reached the limit, yet more homes are going in as we speak,” Baker says. “And that’s the dilemma.”

Since founding the Wimberley Valley Watershed Association in 1996, Baker has been fighting to keep developers from chewing up Jacob’s Well. At the moment, the watershed association is tied up in a lawsuit with a group that wants to build RiverRock, a “residential resort”—spa, “lagoon-style” pool, gourmet restaurant—a few hundred feet from Jacob’s Well. RiverRock wants to build a road through the Jacob’s Well Preserve. Baker hopes to stop the development altogether, claiming that it would pump 15 million gallons per year, which could have a direct impact on flows at the springs.

Baker is also at loggerheads with Aqua Texas, a for-profit water utility that serves Woodcreek, an incorporated subdivision of 1,500 people just south of Jacob’s Well. Last year, almost half the water Aqua Texas pumped from its main well was wasted because of crumbling infrastructure. Worse, when the company turns on the pumps at that same well, the discharge at Jacob’s Well drops a corresponding amount.

In 2005, the watershed group scored a victory by consolidating the four parcels of private land that abut the spring. With a $3 million grant from Hays County, the group is creating the Jacob’s Well Preserve, a 55-acre natural area that eventually will be open to the public.

This effort will be for naught if something isn’t done to manage the Trinity. Hays County is one of the fastest-growing counties in a fast-growing state. In 2000 the population was a little under 100,000; in 2060, it’s expected to reach 500,000. In the past few years, the county has been the scene of intense squabbles between anti-sprawl activists, drawn largely from the Wimberley area’s large retired population, and pro-growth interests. (See “Dateline: Hays County,” Nov. 14, 2008.)

Add water to the mix. The Trinity Aquifer, which is much less rechargeable than the Edwards, provides the vast majority of groundwater for the area. “There’s a lot of straws pulling from an aquifer that doesn’t have a lot to give,” says Ron Fieseler, the coordinator for Groundwater Management Area 9, which covers a swath of the Hill Country.

Geologists say pumping in western Hays has already passed the limit of sustainability. Computer modeling by the Texas Water Development Board predicts water-level declines during a severe drought of between 50 and 100 feet across the Trinity, including portions of Bexar, Travis, Kerr, Hays, Blanco and Bandera counties.

What would that mean? Hays County got a small taste in 2006. Drought, compounded by overpumping, left about 100 homes near Dripping Springs without water and reduced Onion Creek, which flows through Hays County and South Austin into the Colorado River, to a trickle. A report on the ’06 drought by Austin hydrologist Raymond Slade warns of the consequences of a far worse drought, which “will cause many more wells to become dry and probably result in many thousands of people in the County to be without water. Nobody knows when this will happen but it is likely to occur in the near future.” Onion Creek, he concludes, is likely to stay dry except when there’s significant runoff from storms.

Given this harsh reality, Baker says people in Hays County will have to decide whether to trade flowing streams and springs for growth. “It’s a hard conversation to have because no one wants to have limits to what we do,” he says. “But there’s a carrying capacity to these systems.”

Water watchers are keen to see what happens in western Hays County. It may hold clues to the future of the Hill Country. “Hays is the canary because it’s so close to I-35,” says Marbury, the EDF policy specialist. Many Hill Country communities are approaching the limits of sustainability, she says, but “Hays is more dire because I personally feel like they’ve reached the point of no return. Whatever decision they make will be extremely difficult. However, they need to make it soon.”

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

How much did Rose get from the environmentalists over those years?

Peter Stern said...

There's one way to deal with this issue. Get rid of Patrick Rose in the next election. I have tried to tell residents for years that Rose is just another politician. We don't need more of them. We need someone who cares about our community and is willing to work for the people's best interests and NOT for developers and the corporate sector. So, get rid of Rose and that will end some of our problems.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Wilder, thank you for this eloquently written and informative article.

You and this site have taught me more in a very short span of time than I've ever understood in the nearly four years since we moved to this friendly little community about the predicaments and politics surrounding our precious water resources.

I am saddened that so many intelligent and well meaning people choose to bicker over such important matters as clean and abundant (now scarce) water for everyone, and smart planning for a prosperous community.

Please consider convening a large roundtable (as many as are needed) with our elected officials and citizens. I am sure everyone's best intentions will ultimately rise up and agreement will be found. We should be doing our best to minimize division and maximize consensus.

Peace and good intentions to you all.

Thank you.

Liber said...

Let's get it over with. Just sell all the water servicing in Hays County to Aqua Texas. Then, after a few years of their water, we finally see the light and are forced to kick the bums out and manage the water ourselves. We can either do it now or later. It will happen eventually.

Anonymous said...

Critics of Aqua-Texas and “Aquifer Alarmists” say that ATI wastes, through leaks, almost as much water as they deliver to their customers.

In November 2008 an article in “The Ridgerunner” said;
“In 2007, ATI pumped 172 million gallons of groundwater from the Trinity Aquifer. Of this amount only 94 million gallons were sold to approximately 1,500 customers. The unsold water is considered water loss. ATI lost or wasted 80 million gallons of groundwater in that year. That is enough to fill 160 Olympic size pools. This amount of lost water could have served an additional 1,250 customers at normal consumption rates.”

One interesting fact to consider is that Jacob’s Well (spring) has been flowing at about 1 cubic foot per second all through the recent drought. That’s 7.5 gallons per second or almost 236 million gallons per year. That is roughly twice the total amount that ATI pumps and over 4 times as much as the alleged leaks in their system. The water alarmists consider this a trickle. Jacob’s Well is one big leak in comparison to ATI. Maybe it ought to be plugged up. Now that’s a real third rail issue for the politicians.

When I asked several water experts at a recent meeting, “Where does the leaked water go? I never see any water on the surface anywhere in the service area of ATI. I’d figure most of that water is returned to the aquifer by the forces of gravity”. One quick answer was, “It evaporates”. I countered by saying, “It can’t evaporate if not exposed to air and I see none of that”. No one, it seemed, had an answer that made sense and brushed me off. They just kept harping about “too many straws in the ground” and “Full authority for chapter 36”. I am beginning to doubt the veracity of many of these water experts/alarmists.

Anonymous said...

Hey bubblehead "Where does the leaked water go?" . . . I suppose your theory also suggests that that wasted water percolates down to the level of ATI's wells and re-recharges the lost groundwater. Yeah, maybe in 3 or 5 years, if it ever even makes it down that far. Point is, any responsible business should not be in business if it tolerates such huge inventory losses. With that amount of waste, I outta think about sinking a shallower well and sharing the water with my neighbors for a much cheaper rate. How 'bout that for a "third rail" issue for the politicians to consider? Unfortunately, ATI is legally protected, by virtue of its $$ acquired CCN, as the monopoly supplier in my neck of the woods. Imagine that, our own laws protecting a water pirate. Boy that really grates me.

Anonymous said...

#5: You're asking the right questions.

Anonymous said...

I am #5 and for the record, I AM a customer of this retched[sic] company and no, I don’t work for them! My last bill was $165 and it is a crime, but the tack that most are taking to fight this is off target. ATI is evil and doing just what an unregulated devil will do. The enemy here is the TCEQ rubber stamp, the legilature and our secessionist Governor who could rein them in but won’t. While everyone is harping about Chap. 36 and regulating private well owners the bills keep coming in.

The TCEQ bobble heads in Austin have granted every rate increase asked for by ATI. It is a sin to charge customers for legal fees that were incurred in a case not related to the area in which they now serve.

My point is that the water is not going to run out tomorrow no matter how loud the environmentalists cry and misinform the public. I really don’t care what happens to Jacob’s Well, if I have to move out of the area to survive. I’d go down and personally pour concrete in the damn thing if our drinking water stopped flowing. Let’s work on the survival of people instead of “Blue Hole” and some obscure blind salamander. Let’s clean house in Austin and tell the tax and plug water alarmists to just shut up.

Anonymous said...

#6: Re: Aqua Texas and its co-conspirators
You couldn't be more correct. Given the fact that there is more than enough evidence to prove the corrupt relationship between TCEQ and Aqua Texas why the Attorney General has not called for an investigation continues to be a mystery to me. Maybe it is time for the 150,000 'held hostage' State customers of Aqua Texas to file a class action suit against Aqua Texas & its co-conspirators.
Did you know that Aqua Texas has applied for a $9.4 million dollar loan from the Texas Water Commission in order to "fix" the Woodcreek North system? (the Aqua Texas loan application states they need that loan to replace or repair over 25 miles in linear feet). In my mind that should be evidence enough to prove that all these TCEQ granted rate increases, the $19.88 monthly charge (for so called improvements) and the legal fees should be reimbursed to each and every customer in the Woodcreek North area. These increases and charges over the last 8 years were granted by the TCEQ because the system was being "fixed" or needed to be "fixed"...if that were true then why do they need this loan to fix the system? Haven't the customers of this wretched company suffered long enough? You all need to get your money back!

Alyssa Burgin said...

Everything said here is true, and developers are to be held accountable, and so are the politicians who thrive on their offerings.

That said, however, I can't believe that this article ignores the desertification process that is taking place in Texas--according to prominent scientists like Richard Seager of Columbia University, and Ron Sass right here at Rice University. This is not just about developers or greedy politicians, it's about the forces of climate change. The consequences of unchecked climate change will result in a continuation of what scientists are calling "permanent perpetual drought," which is what a big chunk of Texas is already experiencing. To ignore that issue is tantamount to suicide for Central, West, and South Texans.

Anonymous said...

Desertification process? It seems that the environmentalists/scientists that live in academia have to chime in over any water issue just to get their pet theories noticed. They fail to reference history and the fact that droughts are cyclical. Back in 1950s a drought hit this area so bad that the cedar and mesquite trees died. There wasn’t a lot of development going on here at the time. This whole climate change thing is a fraud until more data comes in. A couple of months from now we will likely be complaining of too much rain, mosquitoes and flooding.