WISD considers new lighting, but will it be good for 'learning?'

Before WISD invests in this type of lighting (which is a type of fluorescent lighting) it should determine whether the lighting is suitable for classroom use

Note: We've all heard a lot of stories about the effects and efficacy of different kinds lighting on the eyes. Teachers, parents and students might be interested in learning more about whether this particular type of lighting will enhance, or detract from, the learning process.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Ms. Hopson at hopsonbarbara@yahoo.com, WISD Superintendent Dwain York, 512.847.2414, or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

By Barbara Hopson
Guest Commentary

The lead article in the December 17 issue of the Wimberley View concerns the possible use of induction lighting for Wimberley ISD.

One reason WISD is considering that type of lighting is that it can get the fixtures, bulbs, and installation at no upfront cost. Instead WISD would pay the installer, Green Lighting Solutions (formerly Green Energy Systems of South Texas), 75%-80% annually of the money WISD would save on lighting costs, for an unnamed (in the View) number of years. (Who determines the savings, and how?)

Before WISD invests in this type of lighting (which is a type of fluorescent lighting) it should determine whether the lighting is suitable for classroom use. Induction lighting currently is used mostly outdoors (malls, street lighting) and in giant warehouses and parking garages. It might be suitable for night games on football fields, but perhaps not for classrooms.

LED lighting might be considered by WISD also. (LED bulbs would not require new fixtures.) See what the Federal Energy Management Program has to say about various lighting sources at www1.eere.energy.gov.