Thursday, March 10, 2011
Is Glenn Beck raising your gasoline prices?
For you many independents and fiscal conservatives with hopelessly short memories, it was lack of rules and lack of enforcement that allowed the price of oil to rise to nearly $150 a barrel in 2008, with gasoline at the pump over $4 a gallon
Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Boschert at arrowbiz@texasorp.com, to Mr. Beck at me@glennbeck.com, to President Obama at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact or click on the "comments" button at the bottom of the story
By Rocky Boschert
Financial Editor
OK, so it’s not all Armageddon expert Glenn Beck’s fault that you’re paying $3.40 or $3.70 or even $4.00 a gallon at the pump. But his fear-based take on democracy movements in the Middle East gives weird cover to the speculative traders who jack up oil and gasoline prices without a trace of a supply and demand reason.
The speculators are happy to repeat baseless predictions by Beck that the Suez Canal could be taken over by Iran or that Libyan oilfields are endangered (even though the anti-al Gadhafi forces are working now to get them running as usual). Every dollar of fear-based speculation raises the take of the guys already in the oil futures market who profit from all of Beck’s apocalyptic chatter.
And there’s reason to think Beck knows exactly what he's doing. He both pushes and profits from the rising price of gold – which is as tight as a pea in a pod with the price of petroleum. Maybe that’s why Beck is considering leaving Fox. He is making too much money scaring his supplicants into pushing up gold prices – a commodity he should own given his tales of Muslim rape and pillage.
So Beck puts a “disinfotainment” face on during the speculation that is once again driving oil markets – even as Congress aims to cut, even eliminate, funding for the agency that enforces any regulation of the speculators. While the White House tries to bolster the Commodity Futures Trading Commission with at least the show of Democratic values, the new “tax is un-American” Congress and House Republican Majority Leader John Boehner are proposing cuts that would cripple, er, make sane again, speculative trader enforcement.
For you many independents and fiscal conservatives with hopelessly short memories, it was lack of rules and lack of enforcement that allowed the price of oil to rise to nearly $150 a barrel in 2008, with gasoline at the pump over $4 a gallon. As of the past Tuesday gasoline was at a record price for this time of year – at least $3.50 a gallon - in a week that is usually a low price point for gasoline.
But the Congressional free marketeers whose political campaigns are financed by Goldman Sachs, Exxon, and the Koch boys, et al. don’t see that as a problem. They’d rather get rid of the rules and let the economy fall as it may. Hey, wasn’t that the reason Barack Obama was voted in the last time? Well, “déjà vu all over again.”
And fall the economy will if this keeps up. Here’s a comment from a recent post in the Wall Street Journal on the effect of a highly possible return to $4.00 gasoline: Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s economy.com, said U.S. consumers could handle prices of near $3.25 a gallon, but will get “severe indigestion if oil rises to $125 per barrel and regular unleaded is going for closer to $4 a gallon.
“Consumers will choke and the economy will enter a double-dip recession if oil surges to $150 a gallon or $4.50 a gallon for more than a few weeks. Nothing has a more pernicious impact on the economy than higher oil prices. They act very much like a tax increase, although the money goes mostly to big oil producers.”
Using Beck’s brilliant forecasting, are we headed for the end of the world? Well, using a culinary allegory, not for the rich who can easily afford high gasoline prices with their deliciously low tax rates served up by the Rich Persons’ Supper Club that now controls a majority of the governorships and the House – along with their band of anti-regulatory lobby sous chefs in Washington DC.
And let’s not forget the Head Maître'd, Compromiser-in-Chief Barack Obama, who is constantly conjuring up new political recipes to make himself more “tender” while serving the selective tastes of the country club members at the dinner party.
In the end, though, would they let Glenn Beck sit with them at the dinner party? Not a chance, unless he can provide the elite diners with many more low level American worker servants who will patriotically allow their wages, benefits and economic control to be barbecued American style.
On the other hand, what do I know? I was born in Hawaii 11 years before Barack Obama. And my father was a Missouri-born Caucasian. Does that still allow me to be an American citizen?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Once again oil companies are posting record profits. Which if it was a simple pass along for increased crude prices would not happen.
If something isn't done to rein in the oil companies the economy will suffer.
@Rocky
Thanks for a timely and thought provoking article although I think a bit misdirected. I did however, learn to spell and punctuate “déjà vu” and “Maître'd”. Seriously, I am no fan of Mr. Beck and think he is a pompous ass and more of a drama queen than a commentator. He is another self-appointed messiah trying to lead or mislead a certain segment of our society, primarily postmenopausal Christian men and women. I’m sure he would say the present “crisis” (pick one) is fulfilling some biblical prophecy. I’m guessing at theat because I no longer watch him and get most of my current enlightment from “The Simpsons”. Beck is no more the cause of this mess than you or I ... (Maybe I need to rethink that last line and rephrase it).
The reason for the oil price surge is that the energy industry and the speculative traders are practicing what Obama’s former Chief of Staff, Rom Emanuel once said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste”. The Obama administration seems to have a lot of “crisises”. The root cause of the current “crisis” is of course the unrest in the Middle East. The turmoil will likely end up harming us for many years to come. When those Muslims go crazy nothing good comes of it; read your world history. Has there ever been a time when there wasn’t unrest in the inappropriately named, “Holy Land”? “No matter how many times the delusional fools in the present administration and the mainstream media try to convince you otherwise, sharks are not misunderstood dolphins, and Islam is not a religion of peace.”
I disagree that this happens because we don’t have enough rules. I do agree however; that we don’t have enough enforcement. Is price fixing is no longer illegal or is it just not being enforced? The Executive Branch has been continually watered down since the time of Jimmy Carter. The current Executive is a dismal failure as was his immediate predecessor GW. I feel that GW was the Republican’s answer to Carter since there were so many parallels. It goes without saying that “O” is the worst of the lot, following GW’s lead in not enforcing our immigration laws while obsessing with social programs at the expense of nearly everything else except enriching Goldman Sachs, GM and the Unions. At least, GW did veto one bill for Congress while starting 2 wars. Did I mention that both political parties have screwed us?
Good points, A Libertarian.
I sure would like it, though, if you full-blown libertarians and conservatives could develop at least a tiny sense of humor, or at least a tiny sense of parody. The "misdirected", I think, sort of lies there.
But more to the point; of course Glenn Back is not causing the oil spike; but it was a good chance to covertly slam Beck's problem of not taking his Meds.
However, speculators and the US oil companies are certainly making money. And the conspiracy theory-lite that the Arabs and Obama are subconsciously in concert exploiting the crises to bring down laissez faire capitalism or to gain polical points? Nice try, but I don't think so. You give Obama too much credit (just like we all did with W).
But thank you, A Libertarian, for y0our intelligent, interesting and civil reply. Btw, I agree with you in general.
I think "A Liberterian" is a tea partier in disguise.
Many in the world think "we" are the terrorists. Muslims, Europeans and the entire rest of the world find it difficult to fathom why Bush invaded Iraq.
Now, thanks to Bush, Cheney, Condy, Rumsfeld- 1.8 billion of "those Muslims go crazy" detest the United States more than ever.
We are addicted to oil just like we are addicted to TV, smoking, drinking, and drugs. Even $3.50 gas has not deterred us. So our addiction has us "over the barrel with those crazy Muslims".
Why didn't we start to invest in alternatives after the oil embargos? (See the movie "Who Killed the Electic Car"?) Also, we're a stubborn, lazy lot.
The only time I've seen Beck was a short video of him with a rabbit in one hand and a chain saw in the other. Is he the one who started the yard cross movement in Wimberley, Texas?
The middle class seems to vote and favor exactly what is antithetical to us. We're dumbing down. But let's blame it all on those "Muslims go crazy". Lunch is over; now back to my hearing.
What part of the Saudis saying we will pump more oil to make up for the lost production do people not understand? Supply & demand, remember. If Saudi Arabia makes up Lybian production, there is no supply drop, hence, absent market manipulation by the oil companies, no price increase.
Saudi oil is by no means a direct substitute for Libyan oil. Libyan oil is sweet crude, while Saudi's is sour crude. The UK can not process Saudi's oil, so instead they are stuck paying more for the lower supply of sweet crude, thereby decreasing the US's ability to get the more easily refined sweet crude. And since the cost of refining sour is far greater than sweet, prices go up at the pump. Yes it is speculation too, but the vast majority of the price increase still resides with simple supply and demand. Why do you think there is such a large gap between Brent futures and US futures?
As for oil company's profits; a 10% margin on $100 million is more than a 10% margin on $10 million, right? Does this make oil companies socially irresponsible? I don't know.
But, rest assured prices will go down. Elections are right around the corner. Remember the price crash in '08. Are we really to believe this was due to legitimate market forces? While this run up has a lot more to do with supply and demand, price can still be manipulated by those in power... afterall, they are the ones that designed the system.
Syn, no evidence the oil companies are selling more gallons, only that they are making more profit.
Oil company economics. The oil that we will buy 6 months from now MIGHT cost more, so lets jack up the price on the gas in the tanks today.
Post a Comment