Pages

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Sumter warns of possible increase in county tax rate


Note: One of the most disturbing aspects of having to listen to commissioners discuss their multi-million dollar projects and the implications on next year's county budget was that nary a word was said about the plight of hard pressed home and business owners. Only Judge Sumter came close. Commissioners speak of tax rates and appraisals – a one or two penny increase in the tax rate – as though it's no big deal. Business owners and average folks speak of 30% drops in sales, meeting the next payroll and layoffs. Many people are living on fixed incomes. Get real guys, you are not 'serving the people well,' as Commissioner Conley so fondly believes, if you are entertaining even the idea of an increase in the tax rate. Let's hear less about what great jobs you're doing and more about how you intend to reduce your expenditures and our taxes.

Send your comments and news tips to online.editor@valleyspringcomm.net or click on the "comments" button at the bottom of the story

By Bob Ochoa
RoundUp Editor

Hays County Judge Liz Sumter warned this week that even in the best of scenarios, including a 2.5 percent growth in property appraisals, the county may be forced to raise its tax rate by slightly less than a penny in next year's county budget.

"If we borrow everything we're scheduled to borrow, we're looking at (a tax rate of) 47.63 cents, based on a 4.5 percent interest rate," Sumter said. "It's a guess, a projection of what we will be looking at. It is a growth rate that I don't think anybody is anticipating."

In worst case projections, with growth flat or a dip of one percent, Sumter says the county is looking at increases in the tax rate of slightly more than a penny, up to 48.11 cents. The current tax rate stands at 46.92 cents per hundred valuation, a 1.42-cent increase from the prior year's budget.

"What I'm hearing from people is that they are already stretched as far as they can be stretched," said Sumter. "I still think the commissioners court hasn't addressed the overall issue of how do you move forward with these projects without increasing taxes."

Commissioners and the judge discussed their options at a mini-budget workshop Tuesday Jan. 26 during their regular meeting, far ahead of their normal budget deliberations that start in earnest in the summer. Their plate is loaded with expensive capital projects, including construction of a $72 million government center, parks and road bonds yet to be sold totaling about $70 million, improvements to the jail and possible construction of a new jail with projected costs of between $50 million and $60 million.

Two years ago, voters approved $207 million in road bonds and $30 million for parks and acquisition of open space. Voters were informed then that approval of the bonds would likely result in a 5.1 cent increase in the county's tax rate, spread out over several years.

"Yes, the citizens had full knowledge the rate would go up for the roads and parks," said Sumter. "However, the variable today is the economy itself. No one could have predicted . . . that the economy would have gotten this bad. Even if the court has dictated to go ahead, the question is whether or not this is the right thing to do at this time. Do I think we should raise taxes? Not at this time. If that means slowing down some of the roads or pushing money to another location, then I think that's what we do."

Much of Tuesday's abbreviated budget discussion centered on whether to proceed with construction of the new government center. The project has not been brought to voters for approval, although county officials pointed out it has been under discussion for several years. Its total cost has been pared back from $90 million to a little more than $72 million.

"We built in the cost in the budget five years ago," said Precinct 1 Commissioner Debbie Ingalsbe of San Marcos. "If the growth rate decreases or stays flat, in either scenario, we have the money budgeted."

Dan Wegmiller, the county's bond and financial advisor, presented commissioners with a flex bond sale schedule, with one option to sell the entire $72 million in certificates of obligation and another to split the sale over two years at $60 million and $12 million. "At current interest rates we're still at 4.5 cents (portion of the tax rate), or below, so we're within budget," he said.

Precinct 4 Commissioner Karen Ford of Dripping Springs touted the efficiency the government center will bring to the county by housing many offices and courtrooms in one building. Ford said, "the choice we have today is one big (bond) issue that takes up pretty much all of that 4.5 cents and not leaving much cushion for implications of what our road bond is taking. We could absorb that next year and not have a tax increase next year. It's just a matter of how you manage your debt (issuance)."

Commissioners later voted unanimously, on a motion from Commissioner Ingalsbe, to publish the court's intent to sell $72 million in bonds in late March for the center's construction, with the understanding the sale would be subject to change.

"A week before the sale we'll know what the interest rate will be and come back to the court and go through the same exercise to figure out what the impact will be," said Sumter.

The county's projects building manager Bob Hinkle of Broaddus & Associates, Austin, informed commissioners that a mock up model of the government center is being constructed at the San Marcos Airport.

Commenting generally on the discussion, Precinct 3 Commissioner Will Conley said, "I want the public to know we're on top of the issues, on the road bond issues, making sure they were fully informed of the worst case scenarios. We're coming in under (cost estimates), we are getting low interest rates and we are getting low bids. Where I think we need to have a thorough discussion, and a real area of concern, is when the costs of the government center, or anything, is going (over budget). There are many paths we can go down. We have planned accordingly and have served the people of Hays County well through those plans."

11 comments:

Beware of Career Politicians said...

Instead of constantly raising taxes and increasing expenditures, how about cutting costs and trimming the fat out of county government, programs and services?????

Anonymous said...

Gee, what a surprise.

Sounds like we need all new commissioners.

Impeach the Supreme Court 5 said...

Instead of constantly raising taxes and cutting expenditures, how about building a new government center and repairing our roads by passing some of the costs on to the residential and commercial developers and all the companies along I-35 in Buda, Kyle and San Marcos who raise our infrastructure costs to support their business expansion ventures.

These corporate leeches get a free ride brown nosing politically motivated city and county officials offering tax incentives to draw them here and then generate huge profits while we struggle with our own local budgets.

I'm tired and resentful of my property taxes being used to pay for their expansion infrastructure and then watch them send profits to some out of state corporate offices -- while we deal with hard choices in a bad economy. Hey County Commissioners, why are these businesses not part of the revenue solution equation?

Until the citizenry of Hays County can get out of the economic doldrums, make these businesses pay a corporate property tax to finally pay their fair share. And if they raise prices when they are forced to be responsible to the community, then we boycott their products, which are mostly Chinese or Vietnamese-made junk anyway.

DonQ said...

Totally eliminating property taxes and converting to a Sales Tax or the “Fair Tax” would solve this thing. Ad to that a Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, like Colorado adopted a few years back, and problem almost solved. The only piece missing then is to get rid of the bloodsuckers in all levels of government.

Picking on the businesses out along I-35 and elsewhere kills jobs and stifles economic growth and that is why we are in the mess we’re in now. The notion that the rich should pay for everything is a bad idea that has failed everywhere it has been tried. “Thou shall not covet”, think about it.

Or, you can just sit on your butt and complain while the government take-over of your lives, marches on. Saying that one candidate is better than the other is just being naïve; all incumbents must go every election! Sumter is no better than the rest, she should be sent home to help her builder husband in these tough times.

Never vote for an incumbent! Be suspicious of newcomers as well, look what we now have in the Whitehouse.

Anonymous said...

Impeach, you are either totally ignorant, or just have your head stuck in the sand. The businesses along I-35 don't hardly contribute at all to the County's infrastructure woes. Aside from the fact that it is business coming to Hays County and adding to the tax base at a higher tax rate (because they are commercial), why would you impose on them more taxes than they already pay? If you consider it, they are truly taxed without representation. Corporations don't vote, individuals do, doofus. So, when corporations are taxed, they have to pay or move away, which they can and will do (remember offshore or job outsourcing?). Why do you think that they move to different locations? Finding a way to make a profit (albeit perhaps too high, but that is their reward for the risk of owning and running a business) without excessive government regulation and taxation. So if you like the jobs that we still have, be thankful for present and past politicians, chamber of commerces, and local officials who help to entice businesses to locate their businesses and JOBS here in Hays County rather than Mexico, or God forbid, Travis County.

Impeach the 5 Crony Judges said...

You last two free markets nutcases are brainwashed by your own mindless rhetoric. The reason our local budgets are the way they are is because people like you give away the farm to corporate leeches who will do what they want to enrich their Wall Street or corporate pockets. Local workers are just bodies to exploit. To actually think these companies care about our local economy is incredibly naive.

Many of the jobs these corporations in Hays County provide don't even pay enough for a family to survive on. That is one primary reason why wage earners are in deep hock to the credit card companies. While you watch TV in your trailers feeling self-righteous because you think you are living the American Dream, these companies continue to foster middle class economic decline by 1) exploiting and underpaying workers just so their stock prices appreciate and their executives can get rich and 2) not paying their fair share of taxes because people like you keep your heads up their butts and let them get away with what they want.

You two pseudo-capitalists can continue to be cowards and be citizen-crony proponents of these sociopathic corporations -- while you slowly fall further and further behind economically. I command you to continue to buy their eventual yard sale junk made by the Asians so you can pretend you are part of the American Dream. What you two believe is a fabrication called American conservative free markets superiority.

And for the Anonymous who said "Corporations don't vote, individuals do, doofus?" Who is the real doofus here. What do you think the Supreme Court 5 just voted on? The Court said that corporations are individuals and they have free speech and can buy politicians as much as they want with campaign contributions. I suggest you do not try to present facts if they are based on ingorance.

Finally, Don, don't quote the Ten Commandents to me like a good christian soldier. "Thou shall not covet” is a joke. Coveting is exactly what the American economy is about. Coveting is what makes and creates growth and gets people in debt -- just so they can "covet." You, Don, obviously are not clever enough to try and merge religion with corporate rights. Corporate laws are currently incompatible with spirituality, even though you think you are one of the chosen ones.

Get a life in touch with what Jesus would do now if he were alive. Moses would not have been ordered to "Covet Thy Corporation at the Expense of Thy Neighbor.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Judge Sumter. Now is NOT the time to be toying with a tax increase. Voters in the 2008 bond election did not agree to have their taxes raised in the middle of a severe recession. If the commissioners can't handle all the projects at one time due to a stalled out economy and flat appraisals then they should put on the brakes and start unloading the dead weight out of their own budget. They should not continue to place the burden on us tax payers.

Anonymous said...

Voters agreed EXACTLY to a tax increase when they voted for the bond issue.

Where do you think the county gets the money for the bond issues?

They get it by raising property taxes and sticking it to homeowners for those who really benefit from the bonds, which is not most of us.

Any time voters approve a bond issue it translates into a property tax increase.

Anonymous said...

Why does Will Conley want to have "open communications" and inform the people now?

All he and Jeff Barton wanted a few years ago was to push through the bond package even though it is too extravagant, especially during these hard economic times.

As a few other have stated on this site, I am for getting rid of incumbents. If they can NOT provide positive outcomes during their first term of office they do NOT deserve the votes of residents.

"Get rid of most incumbents" should be our battle cry.

Anonymous said...

I think it's hypocritical of Judge Sumter to vote for bonds, tax and county wage increases and then try to "forewarn" us of a possible property tax increase.

What do you think will happen when you continue to act so irresponsibly?

There should be no new programs and expenditures until we move out of this national economic depression at the county level. All commissioners should be voted out for acting in this manner.

Yes, I know Conley and his cohorts will say that he did not vote for pay raises and was against raising taxes, but that was just a "smoke and mirrors" verbalization to the public. His actions show that he increases the county's debt which ultimately raises taxes. Didn't he push and vote for the road bond package? That increased our taxes.

So, I'm for getting rid of the bunch of them and getting in new leadership for Hays County.

And to all those "scaredy cats" who worry about new people, they can't be much worse than the current group of varmints running the show.

If the new batch doesn't work out then vote them out also. Keep doing this until we get leaders who really care and who we can believe in.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Impeach the SC5.

They get away with it all because the voters and the no voters let them.