Pages

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Economic narcissism, and positive freedoms vs. negative freedoms


The economic values of the elitist neoRepublican Party are based on an addictive selfish and counterproductive attitude of me, me, me. It erroneously pretends that only the state intrudes on our liberties

Send your comments and questions to Rocky at
arrowbiz@texasorp.com or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the column


By Rocky Boschert
Financial Editor

As we enter the Presidential election year, the words “liberty” and “freedom” are commonly being used to justify a narcissistic form of elitist economic exploitation. We see it almost everyday mostly throughout the right wing press and blogosphere, among so-called free market think tanks, and from blatantly obstructionist Tea Party Congressional representatives.

In current practice, the words “freedom” and “liberty” are being used regularly to excuse or justify almost every new assault on the economic lives of the middle class, the poor and the disenfranchised – as well as almost all forms of income inequality to which the controlling 3% subjects our nation’s workers.

As a result, libertarianism, once a noble if not idealistic small government economic philosophy, has become synonymous with narcissistic right wing big corporate injustice and oppression. In the name of “freedoms” and “liberties” – mainly the freedom from government regulation – we are asked by the elitist right wing to 1) vilify government efforts to repair a US economy wrecked by failed Bush era “free markets” economic theories; 2) sustain tax cuts for the super-rich without regard to economic stimulus and job growth; and 3) ignore powerful Wall Street companies using their huge coffers of money to attack and diminish American worker wages & benefits, humane working conditions, and effective public safety and public health protections.

Encouraged by a nationwide elitist right wing agenda, US insurers are allowed to bribe politicians with lobby money to thwart a cost-effective health care system; planners at all levels of government are encouraged to snub reasonable economic development regulations; and big oil and gas are encouraged to trash the environment in the name of energy independence. This economic and legislative haughtiness is nothing more than the powerful exploiting the weak and the rich exploiting the middle class and poor.

Sadly, the right wing elitists have become so self-centered with their greed that they acknowledge few legal or environmental limitations on their power and on the lives of others. And their greed is promoted by think tanks like the Club for Growth, American Enterprise Institute, etc. Their new concept of “freedom” has become simply a dangerous rationalization for more concentrated greed and power.

So why are most Americans so slow or fearful to challenge this false concept of liberty?

One reason has been the effective distortions by the right wing of the difference between negative and positive freedoms. Described briefly, “negative freedoms” – the economic belief system adopted by the right wing elite – are “freedoms” that encourage everyone to live or to act without regard to the economic and social values of the majority. Positive freedoms, in contrast, are freedoms that simultaneously respect both the individual and groups – freedoms that combine both personal and social responsibility.

Positive freedoms exemplify the values of most progressives. Strangely, “positive freedoms” clearly threaten America’s right wing. For some reason they seem irrationally afraid that allowing positive freedoms to thrive will force them to give up their political power and economic success. And unfortunately, for our nation, the right wing elite have been very successful convincing the conservative middle and lower class that the more egalitarian positive freedoms are not in the best economic interests of the nation as a whole.

Today, the elite right wing corporatists continue to hammer home to their middle class base the big lie that libertarian economic values of limited government regulation can be applied equally and effectively to both small businesses and monopolistic corporations. They do so by spewing mean-spirited false accusations against planned economy capitalists, environmentalists and social justice campaigners as being communists or unpatriotic anti-capitalists. Fox News has become the exemplary propaganda tool for this right wing ruling elite.

Unfortunately, this dysfunctional conservative mindset seems unable to acknowledge that one man's pursuit of “liberty” or “freedom” can often conflict with the values and the pocketbooks of others in many ways.

In a productive and economically healthy society, some people's so-called freedoms must sometimes be curtailed to insure the freedom of others. It’s the only mature and productive way to live in a real democracy. In other words, your freedom to swing your fist must end where my nose begins. The freedom to protect my nose (or to protect the contents of my wallet from abusive unregulated businesses) is the freedom and liberty that progressives, environmentalists and social justice campaigns defend.

In America today, the freedoms espoused by the narcissistic right wing elitists intrude heavily on the economic equality of most middle and lower class Americans. In fact, if liberty for myself, any economic class, or nation depends on the misery, exploitation or the repression of other human beings, that system of liberty and freedom is both unjust and immoral.

Yet the right wing controlling elite arrogantly refuses to even recognize this moral conflict. These right wing narcissists aggressively assert that their freedom to pollute, exploit, degrade, and regarding gun rights – to kill, are fundamental human rights. It is a moral social dysfunction and today’s biggest threat to America as a democratic nation.

The economic values of the elitist neoRepublican Party are based on an addictive selfish and counterproductive attitude of me, me, me. It erroneously pretends that only the state intrudes on our liberties. It dangerously ignores the role banks, corporations and the super rich play in controlling and potentially destroying our positive freedoms.

As of this writing, the future political pallbearers of this new elitist right wing mindset is being hashed out by the false prophets with names like “Mitt” and “Newt” – power addicts controlled by their super-rich Super-Pac handlers.

Even someone with memory loss must know that after two long wars fought by everyone’s children but the children of the richest families of America – and after little chance for the country to recoup in three years after eight years of the Bush/Cheney recession-creating war profiteers – returning to those same failed policies would be a perfect example of Einstein’s definition of insanity.


19 comments:

Roy Pursley said...

Rocky,
Please please learn to speak in terms that we, the common people, can understand. Your diatribe is full of words but my overview of your writing is that these words contain no meaning. Generalities concerning people with whom you disagree, but without even the slightest understanding of these people or their background seems to be the justification for your rants. I am fairly well educated and well schooled in economics but find nothing which has substance in your writing. Unfortunately your writing style discourages even the most curious reader from actually analyzing your words. Please direct your writing to specifics which can be analyzed and understood, instead of vague name calling and rants which serve no useful purpose.
Your definiton of Liberty seems to only contain things that you support. True Liberty allows for diversity of viewpoint and compromise among those of different views. Congress is full of people who do not understand this and that, in my view, is a large part of our national party.

Respectfully,
Roy Pursley

Anonymous said...

Rocky,

The things you complain about are not a "party" issue. By the way how many trillions has the Obama administration given to banks? How many Wall Streeters are in the Obama cabinet? How many prosecutions has the Obama administration pursued given the rampant fraudclosures, robosigning, etc.?

Your remark that "negative freedoms” – the economic belief system adopted by the right wing elite – are “freedoms” that encourage everyone to live or to act without regard to the economic and social values of the majority." is somewhat of a mischaracterization - however you cast this as some negative thing. The alternative is "groupthink" where individuals are marginalized for daring to think different from an alleged majority. Sort of a lemming standard. Seems like you are seeking a rather oppressive regime - one where you make all the rules.

Poster Roy Pursley nailed it on the head by pointing out that your definition of Liberty only contains things that you support. You define "negative freedoms" as a bad thing. Things or groups that you don't like are then labeled "negative freedoms" or alleged to support "negative freedoms". Things that you do like are labeled "positive freedoms".

You might want to watch an informative video:
Orwell rolls in his grave.
Ignore the title. The documentary is well done.

If you are so "anti-corporation", then why would you want to live under the rule of the WPOA (HOA) corporation in your own home? Wouldn't you support a petition to remove your section out of the control, burdens, and liabilities of the WPOA corporation? With all these bigger problems elsewhere, why not first start by solving the problem at home?


On a final note, your claim that my freedom to swing my fist ends where your nose begins presumes that your nose is somewhere it has a right to be in the first place. If you put your nose somewhere it doesn't belong, don't expect the fist-swinger to exercise restraint.

Watch the video.

Anonymous said...

"Narcissistic Personality Disorder (inflated sense of self-importance; an extreme preoccupation with one's self)"

That pretty well describes you, Rocky. I think they have treatments for that; Please avail yourself of modern medicine. I am serious, my friend.

Thinking Man said...

What Rocket Man says is particularly true about an obnoxiously loud (albeit hidden-thanks to SCOTUS) segment of the US corporate sector today (mostly Republican aligned per total political super-pacs/contributions, brown nosing, media-controlling and lobbying), that believes greed and profits trump all else. They still don't get it that their belief that 'what's good for the company is good for the country' was disavowed a long time ago by the American people and heroes like Teddy Roosevelt. Folks, America is a community FIRST not a ship full of sardines waiting to be canned or a betting marker on who will win the Profit Super Bowl. Thankfully, times are a-changin. The "negative" capitalists are losing the war. People in America and the world over are waking up to their abuses and excesses. Public support for American style free market capitalism is in a free fall. See for yourself: http://www.economist.com/node/18527446. I view these debates wearing a cheshire cat's smile. I know that Thinking People will not be assimilated by the corporate borg. I know that Thinking People will have the last laugh. I know that in this new year we are embarking on a new, fairer, more creative, more just economic model. All Thinking People are invited to participate in shaping it. (All corporate borg must sit at the back of the room and speak only when spoken to.)

Anonymous said...

To "Thinking Man" and "Rocky":

"Community" is an abstract concept at best. There is no "community" as an entity.

We should be suspicious of calls for “community” since historically such calls have been accompanied by oppressive sentiments such as nationalism, militarism, racism, and religious and other intolerances. In addition, there have always been potential leaders who claim superior intelligence, insight, and ability to recognize, understand, and articulate the common good and who seek to impose their idea of a good society on others.
- Younkins, "In Dispraise of Communitarianism", The Free Radical (May/June 2000)

Certainly folks should be wary of Rocky and Thinking Man's philosophies since they seek to suppress individual freedoms in pursuit of the "common good" defined by Rocky or the Thinking Man. Rocky's version of "common good" is whatever he defines as a "positive freedom". Surely the individual has a better idea of what is good for him/her. Certainly, the individual does not delegate to Rocky nor approve of the usurpation by Rocky of the ability to determine what is good for the individual. Oddly, Rocky claims that anyone that doesn't agree with him suffers from "narcissistic personality order". Talking about the pot calling the kettle black....

By and large, communitarians fail to understand that a community is best viewed as an instrument for helping individuals achieve their chosen goals – it is something that people can freely contract into and withdraw from. Communitarians tend to view it ["community"] as a good in itself – as a source of value that can make demands upon people.
- Younkins, "In Dispraise of Communitarianism", The Free Radical (May/June 2000)

Sound familiar?

Rocky Boschert said...

Responding to numerous comments:

1) From Ron Pursley (who at least has the courage to use his real name):

"Your diatribe is full of words but my overview of your writing is that these words contain no meaning."

In other words, you either strongly dislike my characterization of your economics and your party, or you have no idea what I am talking about?

And saying "I am fairly well educated and well schooled in economics but find nothing which has substance in your writing" may only mean you are not truly educated about economics and as such you disagree with me.

2) To first Anonymous who says:

"The things you complain about are not a "party" issue. By the way how many trillions has the Obama administration given to banks? How many Wall Streeters are in the Obama cabinet?"

Where in my article do I say Obama and the Democrats are doing things right?

Just because I think the people who run the Republican Party are the most despicable leaders I have seen in my lifetime does not mean I think the Dems are doing a great job.

They have also become lobby money whore corporate elitists, just nowhere near as nationally destructive as the right wing elite.

And WPOA has NOTHING to do with my article - other than to give you another excuse to trash them.

3) Second Anonymous is simply a cowardly nameless person living in a hole somewhere out there.

4) Thinking Man is, well, a Thinking Man.

5) Last Anonymous quotes Younkins with:

"We should be suspicious of calls for “community” since historically such calls have been accompanied by oppressive sentiments such as nationalism, militarism, racism, and religious and other intolerances."

In other words, you have described my vision of the Republican Party, have you not?

The most interesting thing about all the negative comments is how lonely you all must be since you all think the concept of community is such a bad idea.

Without sounding close minded, you all just gave a general validation that you all have drank the "elite libertarianism" kool-aid of the neo-right wing's solution to our nation's problems.

Thanks for your comments.

Rocky B. said...

The last comment I will make here is to reiterate the most important sentence in the article:

"Today, the elite right wing corporatists continue to hammer home to their middle class base the big lie that libertarian economic values of limited government regulation can be applied equally and effectively to both small businesses and monopolistic corporations."

This sentence is the crux of our nation's problems.

And if you right wingers, Republicans, or libertarians (or whatever you want to call yourselves) don't think there should be a difference between the role of government in discerning the very important regulatory role it must play between the two, you are simply the reason our US economy is falling apart.

Remember, you cannot play the victim later on. You are making your choice now.

Anonymous said...

@Rocky who said:

In other words, you either strongly dislike my characterization of your economics and your party, or you have no idea what I am talking about?

That's not what the poster said. He basically said that you are speaking unintelligible gibberish.

[citing Younkins] In other words, you have described my vision of the Republican Party, have you not?

The only person bringing "party" into this is you Ralph. Younkins was not making "party" an issue. Younkins' point was Individual human beings should not be sacrificed for the sake of an abstract concept such as the public interest or the common good. In actual communities, these tend to be the interests or goods of persons in power or majorities of their members.


Do you plan to address elimination of the private corporation (WPOA) in your own back yard?

No BS said...

I don't know what Boschert expects to accomplish by his writing other than to engage in conversation with himself. This is pure political sophistry. He could have begun and ended his college poli sci essay with two lines: "I hate neoRepublicans. And I hate bad corporations." Please, spare us all the bullsh*t in between. Go picket something.

Anonymous said...

The US Constitution defines community of the United States as Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, and Providing for the General Welfare. To me, that is not an abstract. It is what our founders wanted our new country to aspire to.

I don't think the Constitution anywhere defines corporations as people with individual free speech rights. Now that's a real abstraction, man.

I'll take the founders bedrock aspirations any day over those of the corporate profit world order.

Who you kidding? The current supreme court and the bought politicians have us all, except the one percenters, over a barrel.

Shame and Hooey on them. Give me back my Constitution.

Thinking Man's Man said...

Anyone who follows the news and reads extensively, as I do, would find a lot to agree with Rocky. Much of what he espouses is indeed true, so I will have to disagree with Mr. Pursley.

Fact: Right wingers and the Tea Party in Congress want to roll back ALL business regulations because it would be good for business ONLY -- no matter the consequences. That thinking is what got us into the mess we're in today. Some regulation should go but you don't throw out the baby with the bath water.

Fact: Republicans in Congress fight tooth and nail to protect the rich from a small raise in taxes but are willing to reimpose higher payroll taxes on the middle class. The robbing social security argument is a red herring, at least for now.

Fact: Republicans want to do away with Social Security and Medicare and replace them with, guess what ... private for profit management. Give me a break. $14 billion a year is already going to the big pharmaceutical companies as part of a Medicare deal thanks to Republicans. Seen a drop in your drug and health care costs, seniors? Don't think so.

Fact: Mostly Republicans are standing in the way of new legislation prohibiting members of Congress from profiting from inside information.

Fact: Political power and the economic playing field are tilted heavily in favor of the very rich and big corporations, big donors, more than ever. You can see this playing out even at the local levels. The rest of us are left to fight for the table scraps. Think I'm wrong?

Fact: The American people aren't as dumb as the aristocracy thinks.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous who said:

The US Constitution defines community of the United States as Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, and Providing for the General Welfare. To me, that is not an abstract. It is what our founders wanted our new country to aspire to.

You need to re-read the Constitution. It does not mention "community". Moreover, when you look at the "Bill of Rights" you will notice that they are INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, not "community rights". "Community" is not a person - it is a meaningless abstract term which is always used to suppress or deprive individuals of their rights.

I don't think the Constitution anywhere defines corporations as people with individual free speech rights. Now that's a real abstraction, man.

No argument there - and that applies to "non-profit" corporations as well.

Shame and Hooey on them. Give me back my Constitution.
Don't forget the Bill of Rights which were designed to address the type of abuses that are inevitably experienced by individuals in your version of "community". While you are interested in enjoying the benefits of the Constitution, surely you would agree that you shouldn't be using "community" to deprive others of the same benefit.

Another Thinking Man said...

Twisted Anonymous writes:

"...when you look at the "Bill of Rights" you will notice that they are INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, nott "community rights".

Yes, and it also means the rights of ALL individuals, not just you and your ilks crazy little world.

The US Constitution writers assumed that citizens are intelligent and would know that it is a blueprint for a better society, not some sociopath's greed.

Rocky Boschert's label about you right wingnuts being dysfunctional "me me, me" narcissists is exactly correct.

All you and your ilk can see or react to is your own needy greed and anger.

I pity your children and grandchildren, if they even want to be around you.

Rocky Boschert said...

Thinking Man's Man says:

"Fact: Mostly Republicans are standing in the way of new legislation prohibiting members of Congress from profiting from inside information."

I don't believe that "fact" is really a fact, TMM.

Although one would think it logical, the reality is that both Republicans and Democrats go into politics to generate riches by using investor insider information from legislation that will benefit either a business sector of the economy or some individual company.

For example, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein's husband made millions subcontracting "education services" through the Bush Administration almost immediately after the Iraq invasion started.

And although he is not a politician, George Soros - a progressive big money friend of Democrats - made millions investing in Halliburton stock during the rebuilding phase of the US Iraq occupation.

This is a new and viable way to become rich:

Get elected as a public servant rail against corruption and power, vote against regulations that apply to the corporate "persons" who paid for your election, and then use insider trading exemptions to become a millionaire.

As we are seeing with Romney and Obama, people will give you money, lots of money, to help you get elected. And, you do not have to pay them back. They are willing to fund your campaign to get favorable treatment when you are elected.

All they have to do is give up their integrity and become pathological liars. Then they are rich.

not about to use my real name said...

The nasty comments directed at Mr. Boschert here is the main reason I never use my real name when commenting on this blog.

Be jamin' ! said...

Dont worry 'bout the nastiness, sista. Jus say your peace and keep searchin for da truth :•)

thinking out loud said...

These folks who don't seem to be about to understand what Rocky is saying in this excellent piece are simply refusing to see themselves in those words.

That the middle class has been hoodwinked into wasting their hope on becoming wealthy someday is a sad fact of American life.

As if the only way to be happy is to be wealthy.

This is so not true, and there was a time in our history when people admitted this to themselves and taught it to their children.

Are we free if our only choices are scarce and expensive water, polluted air and jobs being sent to other countries?

Are we free if the airwaves that we own are filled with lies and the values of the uber-class?

Is having the right to ruin someone else's life really a right you want?

apparently a Communist said...

What right-wing handbook defines "community" as a bad thing to aspire to?

"Either we hang together or we hang separately", as the old adage goes.

Rocky Boschert said...

not about to use my real name said:

"The nasty comments directed at Mr. Boschert here is the main reason I never use my real name when commenting on this blog."

The truth scares people; and when they have to confront their own inner lies with the truth, it makes them angry and attack, often in self-defeating and unbecoming ways.

If you believe in your heart whay you say is the truth, these wild dogs have no painful bite that will endure.