Pages

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Pissed off at the gas pump? “Deny, Baby, Deny”


Perhaps we’ll get serious when gas reaches five dollars a gallon, and demand change when gasoline reaches ten dollars a gallon


Note: The Trickle Down theory of economics seems to be working overtime in reverse. These days, it's "Trickle Up," by the barrel.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Rocky at arrowbiz@texasorp.com or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

By Rocky Boschert
Financial Editor

As gas prices soar, Republicans and oil company executives are starting to revive the same old tired and ignorant rallying cry that echoed around the country in 2008, the last time gas prices spiked and took us into recession.

The totally asinine “Drill, baby, drill!” chant – spewed by Republicans in Congress and around the Gulf even after Deep Water Horizon are addicted to big oil money. They do everything they can to keep Americans addicted to oil by pushing more dangerous drilling in environmentally-sensitive areas and continue our reliance on climate-changing fossil fuels.

Yet, as usual, the big corporate oil Republicans continue to posit a seductive and simple idea: The U.S. has untapped resources that ought to be put to good use. If only big bad federal policy allowed more drilling, gas prices would drop, following standard rules of supply and demand.

But like so many simple ideas, this one is political fodder based on political opportunism and shortsightedness. The U.S. cannot drill its way into free-flowing, low-cost oil and then gasoline. The clear truth is the supply of U.S. oil isn’t anywhere big enough to make a dent in our current oil demands. It is scientifically proven that we have only about two percent of the world’s known reserves.

The larger supply problem is one of worldwide demand (though speculators and Middle East turmoil are too often blamed for current price spikes). As nations such as China and India grow more prosperous, they want their share of the world’s limited energy resources. Like Americans, members of the Chinese and Indian middle-class now view cars as symbols of prosperity and independence.

Anyone with a normal sense of business knows that if you have a limited product that lots of people want, you can charge a lot for it as we see with the Apple iPhone and iPad. That common sense business rule suggests that prices at the pump will likely continue to spike and then ease slightly, as they have for the past few years. But they’re unlikely to drop significantly.

A few far-sighted politicians and our most thoughtful prognosticators have known this reality for years — and said so. Indeed, analysts for a large British bank, HSBC, warned last month that the world may have no more than 50 years worth of oil left, at current rates of consumption, and such demand could lead to “very significant price rises.” (For those of you who don’t want to live in a right wing, American oil company propaganda information closet, read the British magazines the “Economist” or the “Financial Times” for your political and economic news.)

Despite multiple warnings, the American political system has become so dysfunctional that very little has changed since a president named Jimmy Carter tried to get us to get serious about reducing our dependence on oil based gasoline. Sure, cars and trucks get better gas mileage than they did back then. But the nation still lacks, after 40 years, a coherent policy for radically reducing fossil fuel consumption.

Families struggling in the post-recession economic landscape (some still jobless, many earning less than they used to just two years ago) are hard-pressed to fork over more and more money at the gas pump. And for many of those families, driving has become a necessity. They’re not taking leisurely spring-break road trips. They’re trying to get to work, to the doctor’s office, to the grocery store.

Over the last 30 years, suburban and ex-urban development, especially in fast-growing Sunbelt and Bible Belt cities have produced sprawling mega-suburbs, wherein workers may live an hour’s drive (or more) from the workplace. Those suburbs aren’t exclusive enclaves of the affluent, either. Many suburbs, like Plum Creek in Kyle, are economically middle class and racially diverse, so more families of modest means must drive up to an hour to work. A dime a gallon increase can hurt the budget, and twenty cents a gallon can break the budget.

It’s easy to look back and see what might have been: If Congress and state legislatures had adopted sensible energy policies back in the 1970s that promoted renewable energy development, discouraged never-ending sprawl and encouraged public transit, we would have slowed our dependency on polluting fossil fuel consumption and minimized the current pain at the pump.

But even those progressive energy policies of the 70s could still be adopted — pouring serious money into research and development of alternative fuels and boosting public transit, for example. But they continue to be stalled by ignorant and lobby money corrupted Congressional bickering and inertia.

Perhaps we’ll get serious when gas reaches five dollars a gallon – and demand change when gasoline reaches ten dollars a gallon. But don’t forget who you voted into office last November and who their major campaign contributors are.

County imposes immediate ban on use of fireworks


The Keetch-Byram Drought Index was at 671 out of 800 and was expected to go higher due to continued low humidity, high winds and long-term drought conditions


Press Release
Contact: Laureen Chernow
Hays County Communications Specialist
laureen.chernow@co.hays.tx.us
Office: 512.393.229

Hays County Courthouse, San Marcos, TX – Hays County Judge Bert Cobb, M.D., late Monday signed a local disaster declaration for Hays County and a proclamation prohibiting the use of all fireworks or pyrotechnics within Hays County.
Click on map to enlarge
The ban was approved Tuesday by the full Commissioners Court at its regular meeting.

The declaration cites
numerous reports of individuals using fireworks and the determination that the drought and other weather-related conditions pose a significant threat to Hays County citizens, their property, and wildlife. The ban will be in effect until the Governor’s Statewide Disaster Declaration is rescinded or the County determines the need for the ban no longer exists.

The Commissioners Court currently reviews the countywide burn ban at its weekly meeting and will include consideration of the fireworks ban at the same time. The County has been under a burn ban since mid December 2010, but by state law fireworks are not part of the standard burn ban.

Violations of the ban can result in a Class C misdemeanor citation with up to a $500 fine. Hays County Fire Marshal Mark Chambers noted that damage to property from a fire started by fireworks can also result in civil lawsuits being brought by the affected parties.

Chambers said that as of Tuesday morning, the Keetch-Byram Drought Index was at 671 out of 800 and was expected to go higher due to continued low humidity, high winds and long-term drought conditions.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Hays County jointly forms Utility Development Corporation


New corporation represents a coalition of local governments that will investigate options to purchase LCRA water utilities

Press Release
Contact: Laureen Chernow
Hays County Communications Specialist
laureen.chernow@co.hays.tx.us
Office: 512.393.2296

Hays County Courthouse, San Marcos, TX
– The Hays County Commissioners Court Tuesday approved 4-1 forming a utilities development corporation that will be part of a coalition of other local government corporations designed to gather information from the LCRA. The information is not otherwise available to governments due to confidentiality restrictions imposed by the LCRA. The articles of incorporation make it clear that the corporation will not be able to issue debt on behalf of the County.

Mark Kennedy/RoundUp

“Hays County wants to determine if it is in the best interests of its citizens to acquire water and wastewater systems from the LCRA that serve residents of northern Hays County,” said Mark Kennedy, Chief of the District Attorney’s Civil Division who serves as legal advisor to the Court. “Formation of a corporation under the Transportation Code gives local governments in LCRA’s service area a vehicle for collaboratively exploring options and providing an indicative bid for acquisition of LCRA’s systems.”

The cities of Leander and Bee Cave have jointly formed the corporation with Hays County and joined the coalition, and others are expected to join.

The LCRA had been asked by several local jurisdictions to give local governments whose citizens are impacted by its intended sale of water and wastewater utilities the first right of refusal and to delay the sale until the end of 2011, but LCRA declined to do so and is moving forward to sell the utilities. Kennedy noted that the Court had to move quickly to form the corporation, allowing affected governments to make a collaborative, informed decision.

Hays County Commissioner Precinct 4 Ray Whisenant will be one of three current board members in the corporation, joining Frank Salvato of the City of Bee Cave and Pix Howell, City of Leander. Board membership may grow as other local governmental entities opt to join in the coalition.

Monday, April 25, 2011

Ingalsbe responds to questions on Old Bastrop Highway project


We’d be well served to have full-on Public Hearings on this and every road on the county’s construction schedule, or we can expect to pay higher taxes than necessary


Note:
Tuesday's April 26 commissioners court meeting agenda includes a slew of interesting items. Including the Executive Session on the Old Bastrop Highway Project (#21), there is an Executive Session pertaining to right-of-way acquisition for the RR 12 project (#20-Conley), a 10 a.m. "workshop and update" on the HTGCD from Board President Jimmy Skipton (#16-Cobb) and an Executive Session pertaining to the infamous THK L.L.C. vs Hays County lawsuit (#22-Cobb). Check us on this, but we are informed that THK (Texas Heritage Kitchens) has gone out of business and if so, why would the plaintiff's (THK) lawsuit still have justiciable standing in court?

Send your comments and news tips to
roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Brannon at sam_brannon@hotmail.com, to Judge Cobb and commissioners court members at bert.cobb@co.hays.tx.us; debbiei@co.hays.tx.us; mark.jones@co.hays.tx.us; will.conley@co.hays.tx.us; ray.whisenant@co.hays.tx.us or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

From Sam Brannon

Hays Citizens' Budget Project

Week before last, the RoundUp published my story regarding the Old Bastrop Highway project in Precinct 1, a $6 or so million project on a 1.8 mile stretch of lightly-traveled rural highway.

Click on the link for the story: http://hayscountyroundup.blogspot.com/2011/04/county-road-project-raises-interesting.html
Click on map to enlarge
This project, on tomorrow's commissioners court's agenda is part of the $100-plus million road bond projects that are due to begin in the coming months. It also happens to be one of the many reasons that the taxpaying public should be paying closer attention to how and where our money is spent, and demanding more thoughtful answers to our questions. Many of us believe Public Hearings are in order.

I wrote to Pct. 1 Commissioner Debbie Ingalsbe for more detailed justification on why this road needs to built now, and received the following list of reasons from her to publish via an article here.

Below are her responses with some of my commentary in italics:

Sam,
Com. Ingalsbe
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Old Bastrop Highway Project. I’d like to share reasons I believe the project is important to our county:

1. First of all, this road was part of the priority roads passed in the 2008 bond package.


I frequently hear “The people voted for this. Case closed.” Well, the people first voted “No!” in 2007. If we can be asked again in 2008, we can certainly be consulted again in 2011 as we face a very difficult economy and shrinking property tax base.


2. It is a road that has seen a tremendous increase in traffic, in part, due to the high school that was built. According to our road department, on this particular section of roadway from Center Point Rd to the Comal County line, in June and August 2009, there were approximately 2,200 vehicles per day counted.

Figuring 16 hours of use in a 24 hour day, that’s 2.3 cars per minute. I’m sure this roadway was built to safely move far more traffic than that.

[This is the after school rush hour at 4:12pm, a south view from Centerpoint]

3. I have seen students walking to school on this stretch of roadway.


4. The High School Athletic Department uses Old Bastrop Hwy, including this section, for practice runs. This is a huge safety issue since there are currently no shoulders on a large section of this roadway.


These reasons fail as legitimate justifications for this project. The stretch of road from Hwy 123 to Centerpoint, which runs directly in front of the high school, has only 18-inch shoulders (same as this stretch). If student/athlete safety were legitimate concerns, the county would be improving that more-heavily traveled piece of road rather than the piece that begins 1 mile south of the high school.


5. This roadway is utilized for scheduled bicycle and running races/events. Again, because the lack of shoulders, the participants are on the roadway which has blind hills. S.O. deputies and/or other agencies are contracted for these events for traffic control and safety issues.

Again, this fails as a legitimate concern for various reasons. Perhaps chief among them that bicyclists are choosing this road for its current characteristics, which include its remarkably light traffic. In any event, we don’t improve roads for occasional bicycle/running events.

6. This roadway is part of the City of SM Transportation Master Plan.


7. The city of San Marcos has elected to focus and direct growth east of IH 35 to help protect the aquifer and more sensitive areas of our county.

These answers don’t indicate any reason to widen or buy additional right-of-way in 2011, or any other point in time. What is their specific relevance to this road today?

8. There are two very large subdivisions proposed very near and on this section of roadway. The Galesteo Ranch Development, which is approximately 500 acres and has recently initiated discussions with the City of SM regarding their development. They are obtaining utility information for line sizing and discussing roadway and other improvements. They are planning for a mix use including residential, retail, commercial and office. Also, an approximately 1000 acre development at the intersection of Old Bastrop Hwy and Francis Harris. (I am currently waiting on an update from the City of SM on this project.)

Okay, now we’re onto something. But when is the plan likely to be approved? When are utilities scheduled to be installed? What year would home/office/etc. construction begin? What is the anticipated build-out plan?
(Question from the RoundUp: Is anyone currently doing business with Hays County, planning consultant, engineer, etc., involved in ownership or any other aspect of these two planned developments?)

Given the economy and the extreme contraction of private sector investment homes, retail and office space, as well as the lack of population growth in San Marcos in recent years, these projects would be considered highly speculative at this point.


In short, I still don’t see any case for improvements to this road in the near future. And again, if we could revisit the road bond in 2008 after defeating it in 2007, there’s no reason that we shouldn’t be re-justifying each road in today’s difficult economy.


We’d be well-served to have full-on Public Hearings on this and every road on the county’s construction schedule, or we can expect to pay higher taxes than necessary.

Hays County residents have already asked our elected officials to halt all new projects until Public Hearings are held. I encourage readers to share your thoughts with all of our elected officials at Hays County.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Procession to a killing


Events over the years leading up to that deadly November weekend in San Marcos are viewed by many as the culmination of a long procession that was bound to end with someone being killed. In Hays County corrupt officials protect each other – and justice isn’t blind


Note: This is not fiction, folks. O'Dell has spent countless hours painstakingly researching the public record. He has crossed his t's and dotted his i's, as is the trademark of all of his reporting. Sometimes we think there is enough fodder in behind-the-scenes political shenanigans in Hays County to fill a three-volume crime and corruption mystery novel. All the more reason for the need for public watchdogs in our ranks. Feel free to contact O'Dell for more background and his information sources.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. O'Dell at codell@austin.rr.com or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

By Charles O'Dell
Contributing Editor

In Hays County corrupt officials protect each other. When one gets caught others quickly and smoothly do their own internal investigation to address the problem and appear as if they are serving justice and the public.

It’s like asking an alligator to investigate any problems with missing people in the swamp. If you’re politically protected in Hays County you can get away with murder.


It was only a matter of time until protection of corrupt officials in Hays County led to someone getting killed.


It almost happened on September 5, 2008, when Nick Ramus, who lives next door to the San Marcos High School and was Will Conley’s candidate for Hays County Precinct 1 commissioner, pointed his shotgun (illegally loaded with five shells and a slug in the chamber) at Carolyn Logan, but fortunately thought better about pulling the trigger. Judge Linda Rodriquez found Ramus guilty of deadly conduct on April 27, 2010. Ramus is currently into his second attorney as he plays his typical delay game with the criminal appeals court. Logan still fears for her personal safety.


Ramus’ deadly conduct conviction is a side story. The larger Ramus story includes Hays County officials who allowed Ramus to break the law, then covered up for him, and together with Ramus became protected players in a broader scheme of corruption that some believe has resulted in the killing of a 19 year old who was at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and in unexplained circumstances.


A Brief History of Corruption and Official Protection

In March of 2005, when Tom Pope, Hays County Environmental Health Department OSSF Program Manager, was accused of violating state and county permitting laws he responded, “I’m the one who decides if and when I enforce the OSSF laws.”


After years of violating public health and safety laws rather then enforcing them, Pope issued Nick Ramus a permit on September 1, 2006, to operate his non-compliant oversize commercial septic system that Pope knew to be unlawful, and which still remains inoperable today, with the alarms turned off. Ramus only uses his illegal system to dispose of residential sewage. Protecting Ramus, Tom Pope, Conley and Barton, the Environmental Health Department and Hays County District Attorney Sherri Tibbe remain blind to the inoperable system and the Ramus property’s public nuisance condition.


In January 2007, Tibbe refused to investigate documented allegations of longstanding misconduct by Pope and others in the Environmental Health Department. Tibbe also refused to prosecute Ramus for being a public nuisance despite ample evidence and two previous convictions of his being a public nuisance. Just as Hays County Commissioners Will Conley, Debbie Ingalsbe and Jeff Barton did, Pope and Ramus came under Tibbe’s protection.


When commissioners’ court revoked the Ramus permit on April 17, 2007, commissioners Jeff Barton and Will Conley acted to protect Tom Pope by encouraging Ramus to sue Hays County. “We protect our staff,” said Conley. Barton and Conley also had hopes of using a Ramus lawsuit to force County Judge Liz Sumter out of office. Their dirty tricks almost succeeded.


Three months after having his permit revoked, Ramus sued Hays County as he had been encouraged to do by Barton and Conley, and in early 2008, was granted a partial summary judgment by visiting judge Robert Pfeuffer from New Braunfels. Carolyn Logan, who had her civil and property rights violated by Ramus with official approval, and who would become a target of deadly conduct by Ramus, filed as an intervener in the Ramus suit to protect her livestock and her land. Her intervention also foiled the Barton/Conley plan to engineer a large settlement with Ramus at taxpayer expense and blame Judge Sumter. As Logan put it, “My civil and property rights have been violated with help from public officials and no one should be rewarded for breaking the law. Ignorance of the law is no excuse and Ramus and his California partners knew that laws were blatantly being violated with Tom Pope’s blessing.”


The tide of fortune changed in the three years that followed.


Barton was defeated in his 2010 bid for county judge; Ramus and his attorney, Skip Newsom of Dripping Springs, let Judge Pfeuffer’s judgment languish for so long without taking any action (three and a half years) that Judge Pfeuffer recently declared his intent to dismiss the Ramus suit for want of prosecution; and Tom Pope continued to bask in the protection of Commissioner Conley and District Attorney Sherri Tibbe.


A San Marcos Weekend Turns Deadly


Early on the Saturday morning of November 13, 2010, Julie Parsons, Tom Pope’s first wife, made a 911 call to the San Marcos Police Department at 4:55:25am and reported a “break-in” and fondling of her 18 year old daughter, Emma Pope. Parsons told the 911 operator, “They took her cell phone and they were in a bedroom and there is porn on the computer.” “Oh my god,” Parsons is heard to exclaim.


Parsons then called Tom Pope, who had just moved back into the home of his second wife, Michelle Pope, from whom Tom had been divorced just three weeks earlier. Police officers arrived at the Parsons residence twenty minutes after the 911 call was made. They found no evidence of forced entry and nothing was missing from the home. Emma’s cell phone had been lying beside the laptop. Emma and a girlfriend had arrived home at 2:30am and the two of them went to bed without waking Parsons (Emma’s mother). The girlfriend who Emma had said, “slept right next to me,” reported sleeping while the intruder was in the house and Emma said she couldn’t identify the intruder. Yet, Police Incident Report No. 84912, dated 11/13/2010, indicates burglary of habitation and identifies Elijah Espinoza as Offender # 001, despite nothing reported missing from the home and no identification or physical evidence linking Espinoza.

Tom Pope arrived at the Parsons house that same morning and spoke with officers investigating the reported break-in. One of those conversations appears to have given Pope an idea for the deadly plan he put into play that night.

Pope would later tell Officer Duwayne Poorboy when he was investigating Pope for shooting and killing 19 year old Elijah Espinoza, that a female officer had told him the day before, “It’s pretty hard to catch people like this. One of the best ways is for homeowners to shoot them.” Pope would tell a detective that, “It’s frustrating when you see your kid get hurt and you weren’t there to do anything about it and you feel like – I was going to do something about it if I could.” Early Sunday morning, November 14, 2011, another 911 call was made from the Parsons house, this time by a distraught older daughter, Ava Pope, visiting from college and reporting that, “My father shot and killed a young man in their yard.”

Judge, Jury and Executioner

Pope told the police that he rode his scooter over to the Parsons house on Saturday and parked it in the garage. “I didn’t drive my car over to the house. I didn’t want anyone to know I was at the house,” Pope said. Detective Dan Royston asks, “When you say anyone, do you mean the neighbors or anyone?” Pope answered, “I mean molesters, potential intruders.” When Royston asked if Pope had any previous involvement with the police, he responded, “We do a lot of shooting at my brother’s place east of Sequin and the neighbor across the street is a police officer for San Antonio. He never complains but a new neighbor complained one night when we were shooting at 2am.” “I’m pretty practiced with guns – shotguns, pistols,” said Pope. “We have this old refrigerator and would blast away at it.” “I got a ticket for trespassing when I was in college,” Pope added.

Pope went on to describe how he made preparations for what he expected to happen. After Emma and Ava came home about 1:45am Sunday morning, “We sat around and talked till about 2am, then went to bed. Ava went to sleep on the couch. I turned out all the lights and milled around the house,” Pope told the investigator. “I had the revolver in my pocket,” a 38 caliber Smith & Wesson. Pope said that he also had a loaded 44 magnum pistol in the pantry and had brought a loaded shotgun with him that he placed under the sofa on which Ava had fallen asleep that night. “About 2:30 or 2:40, I walked outside to see over the fence. We sort of suspected that maybe the neighbors – there’s like three or four college kids, boys that moved in and one of them had left a note on one of my daughter’s friends car telling her she’s cute or something like that. I went back in the house and turned off all the lights. I suspected the guy was coming back.” “Do you have any idea why this guy would have picked Julies’ house,” Detective Royston asked Pope? “Well, he had 30 friends in common on Facebook with Emma,” Pope replied. “He probably saw pictures of her, you know, on his common friends,” Pope said.

Pope told Royston that he considered his father/daughter relationship to be “average.” His daughter was, “Not really dating anyone but pretty interested in a guy who plays for the University of Texas football team. She’s always got boys interested in her.” “Any boys that you don’t approve of,” asked Royston. “I told her college football players are not necessarily the best to get involved with. She tells me to, fuck off when I say that,” Pope said. “Is he black, white, Hispanic,” asked Royston? “Black” said Pope. Emma would tell investigators after the shooting that, “A black guy had sent flowers to my house on my birthday and he rides a bike to the gym. Creepy guys are everywhere I go.”

Premeditated Execution

“I turned off all the lights. I suspected the guy would come back. I walked around. I was watching the back door a lot.” Here’s Pope’s chilling description of the killing. “He came around the back yard. I watched him and he knew exactly what he was doing and where he was. He made a beeline for that back door. He wasn’t trying to be careful at all, you know, you know. He wasn’t snooping at all. He was in a hurry (long pause) – yeah.” “I saw him moving real fast toward the back door and he had his hand about to open the door. That’s why I opened fire on him – all five shots. Then I opened the door and he turned around and ran and I went after him. I tried to shoot again but the gun was empty. And I followed him out and he fell down out front. I looked at him, shined my flashlight at him and ran back into the house. We called 911. I grabbed the phone but was shaking too much to call. Then after we called I went back out to see how he was doing and he was struggling to breath. I figured he was close to death and I came back in and the police showed up. That’s about it.”

The autopsy showed gunshot wounds near the neck, in the chest, in one arm and in the middle of his back. Tom Pope, who had laid in wait in the darkness, shot five times though the back door window, opened the door and ran after the unarmed mortally wounded boy and tried to shoot him in the back, claimed to police that he “feared for his life.” “What was I supposed to do?” Pope asked as Ava spoke with the 911 operator.

One option clearly would have been to lock the back door, call 911 and let the police do their job. Instead, Pope acted out his “frustrations,” and, “did something about it if I could.” What if the young man was a friend of Emma’s or her girlfriend, Bertie Schneider, who had slept next to Emma on Saturday morning? Espinoza’s cousins, Sarah Garcia and Eliyona Cuevas were good friends of Bertie. What if Espinoza had been invited to the house and was about to knock on the door? No one knows or is saying.

More Official Protection


On November 14, 2010, Tom Pope shot and killed a 19 year old after lying in wait with three strategically located guns. “What was I supposed to do?” Pope had said. Tibbe took the evidence before a grand jury and obtained a “no-bill” (no indictment) of Pope. In their investigation of the killing, San Marcos police rushed to judgment and gave misinformation to the media that defamed the dead boy and prejudiced the public (potential grand jury members). By all appearances they protected Tom Pope. Pope asked Officer Poorboy, “Am I going to get into trouble? Poorboy, “Not in my report.” “I guess either way is fine with me if they take it to the grand jury because that just covers all the bases,” Pope told another investigator.

In his final interview with police on Monday, November 15th, Detective Royston asked Pope, “How are you doing?” Pope replied, “Not everyone gets thrown into state school. Makes me feel better,” referring to the fact that Espinoza had spent time at the Crockett State School, a facility of the Texas Youth Commission. Pope didn’t know this when he ambushed Espinoza at the unlocked back door. It’s safe to assume that Hays County District Attorney Sherri Tibbe did not seek an indictment of Pope for planning to shoot and kill without any warning an unarmed 19 year old young man who arrived on a bicycle and approached the house as if invited. Pope didn’t even lock the back door against an “intruder” of which Pope claimed to police that he, “feared for his life.” Tibbe protected Tom Pope again just as she has done since taking office in January 2007.

Blaming Others

Then, as if to distance himself from the Ramus deadly conduct conviction, justify his own deadly action the night before, and paint himself as a public official victimized for doing his job, Pope launched into a revealing diatribe. “I’ve been involved in my job in the last four years with a big controversy,” Pope told Detective Royston. “I don’t know if you’ve heard about it on Old Bastrop Road. This Ramus guy who got charged with pointing a shotgun at his neighbor. This lady who harasses him, Carolyn Logan, lives next door to him and she’s associated with Charles O’Dell who’s this guy that calls himself a public ah, oh ah, that guy that ah, what do you call guys that are always doing open record requests on everybody?

"He does them to us just to harass us you know, but---anyway, they’re both corrupt people and they’re both, I think our county judge is corrupt too and they have influence over Judge Sumter our county judge who fortunately got voted out.” Pope suddenly asks, “Is the tape recorder on?” Royston indicates that it is. “Oh well,” Pope continues, “Anyway, this Charles O’Dell guy, he’s – he went to Sherri Tibbe about three years ago and accused me of all kinds of stuff. Taking bribes, and drug payments and all kinds of crap and this guy out there he doesn’t like on Old Bastrop Road. So you know - she pretty much – he had three pages of accusations – luckily Sherri Tibbe knew it was bull crap.” “Anyway, my name was thrown around a lot on Newstreamz website here a few years ago, or a couple of years ago on Newstreamz that just came out. I guess you’ve read that. I know some of the guys at Newstreamz but I just don’t want my name or you know, I just don’t think it’s a good idea for me to put my opinion in whatever,” Pope concluded.

Precession to a Killing


Events over the years leading up to that deadly November weekend in San Marcos are viewed by many as the culmination of a long procession that was bound to end with someone being killed. Pope felt that he was protected against any consequences, just as he has been protected in the Ramus fiasco and other violations of the laws Pope had sworn to uphold. In Hays County corrupt officials protect each other – and justice isn’t blind.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Wimberley fire destroys homes

From the Statesman: Officials investigate fire

Three homes burned, couple injured in blaze

An early morning fire in Wimberley on Friday injured two people, destroyed a home and caused significant damage to at least two others, a Hays County sheriff's official said. A man identified as Gary Pigg, 52, was injured in the fire in the 2100 block of Flite Acres Road and was transferred to Brooke Army Medical Center with burns to his hands and feet, officials said. His wife, Gail, who was also injured, was taken to a nearby hospital. Both were treated and released, Sgt. Dennis Gutierrez said. The Hays County fire marshal's office is investigating the fire, he said. One home was destroyed, another was heavily damaged and a third had some damage to its roof, he said.Firefighters from several area crews attacked the blaze that broke out around 4 a.m. in one structure and then spread, Gutierrez said.

Here's the tv news video report and story from YNN, News 8 Austin

Crews from multiple agencies worked to contain a fire that destroyed two Wimberley homes Friday morning.
News 8 Photo
Officials said the fire began on Flite Acres Road between University Drive and Ranch Road 3237 at about 4 a.m. Friday. Three structures were damaged in the blaze and two people were taken to the hospital.

"Upon arrival it (the house) was almost completely consumed with fire, very heavy fire conditions. They initiated fire attack there," Wimberley Fire Dept. Capt. Travis Maher said.

Eric Bedient and his family were staying in a house nearby. He said he heard an explosion and went outside."This over here, the back porch, was like a tidal wave of flames," he said.

Albert Wood was trying to fight the fire when winds quickly pushed the flames into his home."The fire just rapidly destroyed their house and came across under the eaves and took our house out," Wood said. "I was trying to help him. He was fighting it from one direction. I had a hose that was just pissing in the wind there. It was just nothing."

Firefighters were able to keep the blaze from destroying a third home and spreading to the surrounding area.


PEC announces director candidates, April 28 public forum


On the ballot this year will be a member vote to recommend to the Board which of three systems should be used for future director elections



Click here for election time line, candidates contact info and a recap of the 2010 election

TO: All PEC-area newspapers
MEDIA CONTACT: Anne Harvey, (830) 868-4933; Austin line, (512) 219-2602

Read the complete press release here
| PEC website: www.pec.coop

At its April 18 Board meeting in Johnson City, Pedernales Electric Cooperative’s Board of Directors announced that six PEC members will run for two director positions in the upcoming Board election. The Cooperative’s membership will elect directors for Board districts 2 and 3.

The following candidates, listed in the order they will appear on the ballot, achieved nomination by getting the required 100 member signatures and completing other official paperwork:

– Director, District 2: Alan Yore, Cedar Park; William D. (Bill) Boggs, Leander

– Director, District 3: Stephen Thomas, Cedar Park; Kathy Scanlon, Austin; Tom Gress, Cedar Park; Matthew Weldon, Austin

PEC is holding a public forum on April 28 where members can meet Board candidates and hear them communicate their credentials, experience and views. The event will begin at 5 p.m. at PEC headquarters, located at 201 S. Ave. F in Johnson City, and also will be live-streamed over the Cooperative’s website. Each candidate will have five minutes to address topics of their choice, and the streaming video of the addresses will be recorded and posted to the PEC website.

Members in attendance will have the opportunity to speak with candidates after the presentation portion of the forum. Ballots, candidates’ biographical information and voting instructions will be mailed to all PEC members by May 4.

Also on the ballot this year will be a member vote to recommend to the Board which of the following systems should be used for future director elections:

– At-large system (currently used system): Directors are locally nominated by petition of members within their district, but elected by a vote of members from all districts across the Cooperative.
– Single-member system: Directors would be nominated and elected locally, by action of only members within their district.
– Hybrid combination of at-large and single-member systems: Most directors would be elected locally, by members within their single-member districts. A smaller number of directors would be elected by all members of the Cooperative.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

LCRA initiative stymied by 2-2 vote at commissioners court; what next?


Whisenant and Cobb tried to force it through without answering some very important questions
Com Whisenant
Update: Commissioner Whisenant called to say he has indeed requested the LCRA water initiative be placed again on the agenda for next week's county commissioners court meeting. In a brief phone interview, Whisenant said LCRA "would like to have $300 million" for its water/wastewater systems that serve a number of small communities in Central Texas, including a retail operation and pipeline network that serves an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 residents in north Hays County.

"From the standpoint of my involvement, the reason I'm involved," Whisenant said, "is my hope to find some option to provide water at a reasonable cost . . . and if private industry does that it's almost certain it's going to cost somewhat more . . . the r
eason I took this on is to have a say in the ability of a public non-profit structure to provide possibly in the long run wholesale water. I don't want Hays County in the retail (water) business."

Whisenant said there are more details in Tuesday's agenda packet.

Other points the commissioner made:

– The reason for the creation of a coalition corporation is that it allows a single entity to be an effective bidder at a cost effective price. The cities of Bee Cave and Leander have already signed on (leaving Hays County the odd man out, for now). It takes three county or municipality members to sponsor a corporation eligible to make an offer, other than from a private sector interest.

–
The "only financing in any of this through the (coalition) development corporation is revenues which means any bonds sold would be revenue-based, no ad valorem taxes would be supporting this, just the water users . . ."

– If the county's/coalition indicative bid is submitted, whoever decides to move further it could take up to four years before the ink is dry on a final deal . . . one of the reasons for all the confidentiality is "because of the bidding process," information such as the future water costs charged by the LCRA. The confidentiality of "sensitive" information is insisted upon by the legal and financial advisers and required by confidentiality agreements.

–
Whisenant said he has not talked to any developer in regards to the county's interest in the LCRA system. There have been two independent water providers (IOU owners) that have expressed an interest in working with the coalition; any potential future agreements would have to be made through inter-local agreements.

– Whisenant said he doubted private investors would be interested in purchasing LCRA's systems, because "they're not producing enough revenue."


Note:
As of 10:15 am, we're not sure if Pct. 4 Commissioner Ray Whisenant plans to request that the LCRA initiative be placed back on the commissioners court's agenda for its next meeting, Tuesday April 26. County Judge Bert Cobb's office, which prepares the agenda, wasn't sure either. We're waiting on a call back from the commissioner. Today is the deadline for agenda item requests, as it must be posted 72 hours before the court's meeting, per the Texas Open Meetings Act.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Brannon at sam_brannon@hotmail.com, to Commissioner Whisenant at
ray.whisenant@co.hays.tx.us (512.858.7268) or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

As I explained in my last mail, LCRA is trying to sell a group of money-losing assets, including waterlines that serve 5,000-10,000 northern Hays County customers. Commissioners Conley and Whisenant are leading the charge, with support from Judge Cobb, in driving Hays County's participation in the purchase. At this point, it looks very misguided.

The problem is: a) This could be very expensive and risky in the long term for Hays County, b) Hays County is already facing $357 million debt within the next 11 months, and c) Rather than making a reasonable case to justify why the county would even be interested in taking part in this purchase, Whisenant and Cobb tried to force it through without answering some very important questions. In fact, Judge Cobb did his best to limit the questions.

For more information on the background on this story, read my article and comment from Tuesday at: http://hayscountyroundup.blogspot.com/2011/04/lcras-white-elephant-water-properties.html

Update
Tuesday we left the Commissioners Court with a 2-2 vote (Conley was absent again) on the agenda item to create the "Coalition Corporation" to move forward on submitting an offer on the LCRA properties. With the 2-2 vote (Commissioners Jones and Ingalsbe voting No) the motion failed. That's good news.

Action
Many of you wrote our elected officials about this initiative. Thank you for doing so. I now ask you to write Commissioners Inglasbe (512.393.2243) and Jones (512.262.2091) thanking them for their support, and for taking no action. This was a very important vote and we need to show our support to them for doing the right thing for the people in their precincts, and for all of Hays County. An earnest letter of thanks would help a great deal.

Whisenant stated his intention to get this on the agenda again ASAP, and I suspect there will be pressure put on both Jones and Ingalsbe to help it along. Let them know we're on their side. I also suggest writing Judge Cobb (512.393.2205) and Commissioner Whisenant letting them know we expect better than what was offered in court on Tuesday.

Sam Brannon
Hays Citizens' Budget Project

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Federal team helping Texas as 2nd firefighter dies

AP – Smoke rises from an uncontrolled wildfire burning near Possum Kingdom, Texas, Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Associated Press
Danny Robbins

2 pm/April 20, 2011

Click here for the complete story

DALLAS – Federal firefighters and officials from several U.S. agencies joined the fight against a massive wildfire burning 70 miles west of Fort Worth on Wednesday, the same day a Texas firefighter died from injuries suffered while battling a blaze earlier this month.

The fire at Possum Kingdom Lake is among several that have scorched about 1 million acres across bone-dry Texas in the past two weeks.

The federal team joined local personnel to help fight a blaze that has burned 150,000 acres and destroyed about 50 homes, said Haven Cook, a spokeswoman for the Southern Area Incident Management Team. It's the second time a federal management group has been assembled in Texas to help battle the blazes that have been burning across the state for weeks.

Litten said firefighters have had trouble containing one corner of the largest West Texas fire, burning over more than 200,000 acres in Jeff Davis and Presidio counties, but hoped Wednesday to institute a plan that would stop it by letting it burn to a road.

The Possum Kingdom fire started Friday and spread into two other counties. The 400 residents of Palo Pinto, about 50 miles west of Fort Worth, Tuesday night were ordered to leave because of the advancing flames, said Trooper Gary Rozzell of the Texas Department of Public Safety. The county's jail inmates also evacuated, as did the nearby community of Graford and the small town of Strawn, south of the lake.

Associated Press reporter Betsy Blaney in Lubbock contributed to this story.


Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The budget gospel according to the prophet Ryan


Ayn Rand, one of Ryan’s heroes, said, "Money is the barometer of a society's virtue," and she made no apology for not liking the teachings of a compassionate Jesus. In my mind, that automatically puts the Paul Ryan budget as a moral non-starter


Note: Throw on your flame retardant suits, Rocky's on a hellfire and brimstone tear and rightly so.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Rocky at arrowbiz@texasorp.com or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

By Rocky Boschert

Financial Editor


Apparently Republican budget ubermensch Congressman Paul Ryan makes every member of his staff read philosopher Ayn Rand, the shameless promoter of the gospel of aggressive self-interest. This makes sense – given Congressman Ryan's new budget proposal. Given how coldhearted and compassionless his budget really is, maybe he and his staff should read the Bible instead.

While widely lauded by his fellow Republicans (I refuse to call them what they are not: “conservatives”), Congressman Ryan's budget isn't really about deficit reduction. It's about the economic choices that will ultimately determine what kind of a country we want to become. Sadly, the Ryan budget has made the choice to further diminish American citizens who don't have the political and economic clout to defend themselves.

Shamelessly, two-thirds of the long term budget cuts that Ryan and his ilk proposed are directed at modest and low-income people, as well as the poorest of the poor. At the same time, he proposes more tax cuts of up to 30 percent for some of our country's wealthiest individuals and corporations. In short, the most vulnerable members of society are being attacked by Ryan and his supporters. In my mind, this clearly makes them bullies.

In dramatic written contrast, the Ryan budget helps Americans who need help the least. Wealthy individuals and companies reap a windfall of benefits in Ryan's plan – with even more tax cuts and breaks, continued subsidies and loopholes for every powerful special interest, and increased corporate welfare payments from the government. Congressman Ryan and his supporters have carefully and faithfully rewarded the elite and the clients of corporate lobbyists who make their campaign contributions, and, with no shortness of arrogance, have also rewarded themselves as “superior” rich people. In essence, this makes them corrupt.

And, as self-professed but disingenuous budget hawks, Ryan and his cronies have completely ignored the most consistently egregious, wasteful, and morally compromised area of the entire US federal budget – our endless and unaccountable military spending and our failing war machine. Paul Ryan and the Republicans would cut nothing from the Pentagon profligacy. This also makes them the worse of power addicted hypocrites.

Is this language too strong? "Bullies," "corrupt," "hypocrites." If you think so, listen to the prophet Isaiah:
"Doom to you who legislate evil, who make laws that make victims – laws that make misery for the poor, that rob destitute people of dignity, exploiting defenseless widows, taking advantage of homeless children. What will you have to say on Judgment Day, when Doomsday arrives out of the blue? Who will you get to help you? What good will your money do you?" (Isaiah 10:1-3, The Message)
Ryan's budget follows almost line by line the "oppression" Isaiah rails against. Ryan's budget slashes health care for the poor and elderly by gutting Medicaid, privatizes Medicare for the benefit of insurance companies, and cuts funding for food stamps for families, early childhood development programs, low-income housing assistance, and educational programs for students.

Cuts of this magnitude for people of modest and low-incomes will result in a direct increase of poverty and misery in America. Furthermore, poverty-focused international assistance proven to save lives is under attack. Simply put, the Ryan budget is a bonanza for the rich and economic devastation for the poor, seniors, and the sensibilities of any American with a true Christian, spiritual, or social justice conscience. And hopefully it will never be accepted by the religious community.

So, does Ryan's budget express the values of the American people? Or are the American people so morally defeated after 9/11, two major recessions (where no one went to jail), and two wars which have created massive debt and hundreds of thousand dead – one based on lies and another failing miserably?

Of course many Americans believe that rising deficits are immoral and a threat to our future. But how you reduce a deficit is the real moral issue. And to do so by further impoverishing an already weakened middle class and poor as well as children and senior citizens - in order to add more wealth to the wealthy - is not an acceptable political or moral strategy.

Ayn Rand, one of Ryan’s heroes, said, "Money is the barometer of a society's virtue," and she made no apology for not liking the teachings of a compassionate Jesus. In my mind, that automatically puts the Paul Ryan budget as a moral non-starter.

Shortly after Ryan offered his bully indifference budget, President Obama offered his budget, where he both failed and succeeded. What Obama failed to say was that we are currently wasting lives and billions of dollars in Afghanistan – on a strategy that fails to make us any safer.

Where the president did succeed was by making this important statement: "In the last decade, the average income of the bottom 90 percent of all working Americans actually declined. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent saw their income rise by an average of more than a quarter of a million dollars each. That's who needs to pay fewer taxes?"

This last line was the clearest message we've heard for some time from the White House. Sadly, and suspiciously, it came after the President already compromised on extending the Bush tax cuts. Are these nothing more than new second term false campaign promises? Hopefully not! But I for one am not going to trust and wait.

In the end this mean-spirited Republican and cowardly compliant Democrat budget attack on the middle class, the poor, children and seniors needs to be stopped now. Progressives, cynical liberals, compassionate small government conservatives and sensible libertarians need to come together and speak out vehemently against this new 21st century bully and hate budget put forth by these covetous politicians and their elitist masters.

And all politics aside, there is hopefully one thing we can all agree on: We are wasting precious lives and needed money with a misguided and endless strategy in Afghanistan. For those of you who truly care about the US budget deficit, this is the first place we should declare a budget war.


Ayn Rand

"I loathe humanity for its failure to live up
to its highest possibilities."


– Ayn Rand






GOP escalates war against middle class and poor; and a letter to Isaac on HB 1112


Cuts: Programs for the poor and taxes of the wealthy

Note:
Driftwood area resident and columnist Stern shares his thoughts on Congress' battle royal over the Federal budget. And below a letter from Stern to our State Rep. Jason Isaac about House Bill 1112. The bill has been placed on the General State Calendar. Read the text here, and the bill analysis.

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Stern at pstern@austin.rr.com or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

By Peter Stern

Guest Commentary


Many still do not recognize the new Civil War taking place in the U.S. Instead of North vs. South, the battles focus on the Wealthy and the Poorer population.

This could become deadly for many of us, as the GOP has increased its legislative majority and clout at the national, state and local levels and the party is now looking to cut and/or privatize many long-time very American programs, especially those programs for the elderly and the poor. The programs include Social Security, Medicare for the elderly and disabled and Medicaid for the poor and/or elderly. This is a bad move for most Americans.


Meanwhile, both Republicans and Democrats continue to look for ways to line the pockets of the wealthy and/or the corporate sector, who will reap huge profits and will get more tax breaks. All this while the majority of Americans are trying to hold on to their, jobs, homes, health and their dignity.


Contact the President, your Senators and House Representatives and elected officials and tell them to stop the new Civil War . . .
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Tax corporations and the wealthy their true share and cut expenditures in other areas, e.g., providing money, goods and services overseas and slow down the American war machine.


America's government made a commitment to their elderly, disabled and poor. It is time to reaffirm that commitment, NOT destroy it.


_______________________


Dear Rep. Isaac:


HB 1112, a.k.a., perpetual toll taxes


I am writing about the pending HB 1112 that is another attempt at pushing perpetual special interest toll roads and provides a method for Regional Mobility Authorities (MRAs) to borrow borrowed money to assist in developing and regulating more toll roads throughout the state. My family and I are requesting that you use your (our) vote to stop HB 1112 from being approved. For the past decade Texans have fought against these toll roads and we will continue to do so. Please vote against special interests and against toll road profiteering. Texans do NOT want to pay infinite tolls that will be handed-down to our children's grandchildren and beyond. Please vote "NO" on HB 1112.


Sincerely,


Peter Stern, 16700 FM 1826, Driftwood, TX 78619, 512-426-4802

Monday, April 18, 2011

LCRA's white elephant water properties up again on Court's Tuesday agenda


Commissioner Whisenant explained that part of the indicative offer includes a confidentiality agreement will be signed, so there are many details that will not be shared with taxpayers. This is unacceptable


Note: We can't figure which is worse – the county going down its fiscal tracks blind and at a high rate of speed, or pulling the blinds on the taxpayers of Hays County. If anyone's got an answer, let us know. Now the court and commissioners are stonewalling requests for public information regarding the details of the county's involvement in a headlong rush to purchase a collection of failing water and wastewater systems from the LCRA. Not a good sign.

Two related items are on the agenda for Tuesday's April 19 commissioners court meeting: No. 26 – "Discussion of material relating to the Hays County Water and Wastewater Authority and/or the LCRA divestiture (Whisenant)" and No. 17 – "Discussion and possible resolution of the Commissioners Court accepting a petition for the creation of a "Coalition of Central Texas Utilities Development Corporation"; approving the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and Directors of said corporation; and authorizing the County Judge to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Hays County, the City of Leander and the City of Bee Cave related to LCRA's intent to sell its water and wastewater systems (Whisenant)."

Are commissioners and County Judge Bert Cobb making promises with the taxpayers money that the taxpayers have no earthly idea what they're paying for or how it will be paid? It sure looks that way. We hope more folks will join Sam Brannon, author of the letter below, in asking questions and demanding answers.

Send your comments and questions to roundup.editor@gmail.com, to Mr. Brannon at sam_brannon@hotmail.com, to Judge Cobb and Commissioners at bert.cobb@co.hays.tx.us; debbiei@co.hays.tx.us; mark.jones@co.hays.tx.us; will.conley@co.hays.tx.us; ray.whisenant@co.hays.tx.us or click on the "comments" at the bottom of the story

Judge Cobb and Commissioners Ingalsbe, Jones, Conley and Whisenant:

Last week I wrote you sharing some concerns about the LCRA initiative. This week I'm writing again asking for NO ACTION on this item this week.

In less than 11 months, Hays County will be carrying $357 million in debt. The taxpayers are extremely cautious about taking on any unnecessary debt, costs, or risk. We want very deliberate and open process on this discussion, and straight answers with little-to-no effort expended to get them.

Last week's commissioners court conversation was very light on details, as Commissioner Whisenant explained that LCRA has not been very responsive in getting information out.

Tuesday, we'll be looking for much more detailed answers to many points, including the following:

– We've been told that LCRA serves 3,000 Hays County retail customers, and an estimated 7,000 through other water companies/MUDs.

We want to know how being involved in the acquisition of these assets serves the 157,000 people who call Hays County "home." Who are the members of the "coalition"? The incorporation paperwork only listed Hays County and Bee Cave (pop. 2,000) and Leander (pop. 26,000), which doesn't represent much of a coalition. Where is Travis and Williamson County, Rock Rock and Austin?

Commissioner Whisenant mentioned 20-30 other members last week, but when I asked him for a list of the members and prior meeting dates, he had his assistant, Linda Kinney, forward the request to Mark Kennedy as an FOIA (Freedom of Information Act request). Kennedy suggested it may have to go to the Office of the Attorney General for review. This doesn't reflect well on the court's intentions as fiduciaries on behalf of the People of Hays County.

Commissioner Whisenant indicated that the City of Dripping Springs was not a member of the coalition at this point. Since the customers are primarily in the Dripping Springs area, wouldn't it make more sense for Dripping and the local MUDs or other entities to take part in the coalition rather than Hays County? And if Dripping and the local MUDs and other entities are not willing to handle this themselves, most folks in Hays County would likely not want the bother/expense/risk either.

Commissioner Whisenant also indicated that Hays County's investment would be large, more than we can afford in cash, so debt would be issued. The backup paperwork seemed to indicate that the corporation would not be assuming debt on behalf of the People of Hays County, or offer the taxable property in Hays as collateral. We'll be looking for clarification on this.

– What is the significance of May 23rd? Is that LCRA's offer deadline? What has to happen by then, and why then? Other than the initial meeting when the LCRA representative originally presented to the court, the only meeting held about this was last week, and little came from it, and Commissioner Whisenant admitted he knew little of what was going on.

– Who is/will be performing the due diligence on the purchase and when will it begin? Last week I asked whether every reasonable alternative to Hays' participation has been considered. Commissioner Whisenant indicated that Hays' involvement with the "coalition" was the only option being pursued. If only the approximate 10,000 customers are affected, then there may be other numerous options including Dripping and the 4 locals MUDs participating (rather than Hays), or the customers forming their own co-op. These make much more sense than involving everyone across Hays County in a project with such a narrow benefit.

If the primary interest is to service new development, then we should be discussing it in those terms. For instance, if there are 2,500 lots planned that would benefit and the portion of the assets that serve them comes to, say, $5,000,000, then the developers could make the investment and just add $2,000 per lot.

In short, you have the fiduciary responsibility to limit cost and risk to Hays County taxpayers, and fully evaluating alternatives is part of that. I've heard that this acquisition has been discussed for some time by members of the "coalition," and that a broader strategy may be in play. If that's the case, Hays taxpayers want to know about it, and we should look at the options in that context.

Commissioner Whisenant also indicated that this initial purchase may require subsequent investments. These should be fully disclosed. The LCRA assets are money losers by their own admission. Is Hays County willing to lose money on the delivery of water to current customers?

Commissioner Whisenant explained that part of the indicative offer includes a confidentiality agreement will be signed, so there are many details that will not be shared with taxpayers. This is unacceptable. LCRA is not in the driver's seat on this deal – they're trying to unload some money-losing assets. If we cannot negotiate an agreement that allows for the details to be discussed openly with taxpayers, then Hays County should not be entering any agreement related to this purchase.

We're looking forward to a very informative meeting on these and other points.

Four-member county committee tackles precinct redistricting


Are there good reasons for citizens to be concerned about the makeup of the committee? That is for you to decide


Note:
We asked Pct. 4 Commissioner Ray Whisenant if he felt comfortable with the makeup of the county's 4-member Redistricting Committee. His short answer was 'yes,' both Commissioners Ingalsbe and Conley are veteran members of the court and Ingalsbe has some experience in redistricting. We are also informed by the County Elections Office that the county's redistricting plan must be completed by July or August and sent to the U.S. Justice Department for review and clearance, so now is a good time to make your preferences known about any changes that may take place. Commissioners precinct boundary lines are sure to change, possibly Justice of the Peace and voting precinct lines as well.

For updates on the county's Redistricting Committee activities, contact Laureen Chernow, Hays County Communications Specialist laureen.chernow@co.hays.tx.us, office 512.393.2296, Pct. 1 Commissioner Debbie Ingalsbe at debbiei@co.hays.tx.us, 512.393.2243, or Pct. 3 Commissioner Will Conley at will.conley@co.hays.tx.us, 512.847.3159

Send your comments and news tips to roundup.editor@gmail.com or click on the "comments" at the end of the story
Click on the map to enlarge
[The Ideal Population figure for each precinct in Hays County is 39,277 people (Hays County population of 157,107 divided by 4 precincts). Present populations for the 4 precincts and their deviation from the Ideal:

Precinct 1 (eastern San Marcos, mostly east of 1-35; eastern Kyle) 38,593. Needs to gain 684 population to be at ideal. Precinct 2 (Buda, Kyle) 52,671. Needs to lose 13,394 population to be at ideal. Precinct 3 (about half of San Marcos; Wimberley; Woodcreek) 33,893. Needs to gain 5,384 pop to be at ideal. Precinct 4 (Dripping Springs area) 31,980. Needs to gain 7,297 pop to be at ideal.

As you can see, Precinct 2 needs to shed population/area to all 3 other precincts.

If you live in San Marcos, you might prefer that all of your city be in one precinct instead of in Precincts 1 & 3 as it now mostly is. The problem with letting all of SM be in one precinct is that voters/residents in Precinct 3 (Wimberley/Woodcreek and environs south and west) would lose the currently most populous part – the western part of San Marcos. Lopping off the San Marcos area from Precinct 3 would leave a large gap to make up to get back to the 39,277 ideal.

Precinct 2 is the one which needs to lose territory. The precinct extends to the Travis County line on the north and to the Caldwell County line on the east. Let those boundaries of Pct. 2 remain. Precinct 4 (Dripping Springs area) needs to gain 7,297 people. Expand Pct. 4 to the east, along FM 150, taking in only the part of Kyle that is west and north of FM 150/2770 intersection (leaving Kyle largely intact). Precinct 1 (eastern San Marcos – mostly east of 1-35; eastern Kyle) needs only 684 people to be at the ideal. Maybe take from Precinct 2 the small area below Cotton Gin Road, near Caldwell County line. Precinct 3 needs to add 5,384 people. Keep current territory and from Precinct 4 add some area in the southernmost part of their current precinct. That territory might be the area south of a line formed by RR 3237 and RR 150 West, to where RR 150 West meets 2770. Also, from Precinct 2, add the area south of the line formed by RR 3237 and RR 150 West, up to the point where RR 150 West hits Cypress Road.

The County Redistricting Committee has the breakdowns of population on even intra-precinct level. These ideas are just a broad and first look at county redistricting. Add your ideas or objections in the comments.
You can find precinct maps by going to the Hays County website. Click on the link and click on "Precinct Maps" in bold face: http://www.co.hays.tx.us/index.php/search/?search_paths[]=&query=maps.]
Redistricting the boundary lines for County Commissioner Districts happens only once every ten years, and this is the year that Hays County will undergo redistricting efforts.

New boundary lines could mean a new representative for you — one you didn't have a vote to determine. New lines and gerrymandering (moving voting boundary lines to benefit one political party over another) can have a long-term impact on the balance of power in our county government.

In short, it’s all about decisions now that stay with us for a long time.

Commissioners voted in early March to establish a four-member redistricting committee. Those members are Commissioners Ingalsbe and Conley and the Democrat and Republican county party chairs. There were a number of speakers from the public, all of whom spoke out against the make-up of this committee. Their reasons ranged from not enough diversity to self-interest on the part of both Commissioners.

The self-interest argument is obvious. Both Ingalsbe and Conley will likely seek re-election this year (the filing deadline is in December). It’s hard to imagine that either one of them would OK new boundary lines if the final map was not to their benefit.

Are there good reasons for citizens to be concerned about the make-up of the committee? That is for you to decide.

It might be wise to consider some of the facts:

- August 11, 2009 Ingalsbe requested that the County Commissioners approve hiring Rolando Rios (a consultant who will help draw new boundary lines for commissioners) without a competitive bid process. Fortunately, the idea was not supported by the court.

- June 8, 2010 Ingalsbe and Conley who sat on a 4 member committee (themselves and two staff members) reviewed the applications received from the competitive bid process and recommended to Commissioners Court that Rolando Rios be hired. This approach was noticeably different from what took place 10 years ago. In the previous effort, there was a 10 member committee to review bids and make a recommendation regarding a consultant.

- March 1, 2011 Commissioners Ingalsbe and Conley requested forming a four member redistricting committee to include themselves (Ingalsbe and Conley) and the Democrat and Republican party chairs.

Ten years ago, the court appointed 10 members to the redistricting committee. Those members were the six members of the Election Board (Elections Administrator, Tax Assessor, County Clerk, County Judge, as well as the Democrat and Republican party chairs), three staff members, and Ingalsbe. Two elected officials ultimately stepped down from the committee and were replaced by two minority representatives from the public.

In response to citizens concerns about the make-up of the redistricting committee, the court moved ahead with virtually no discussion, quickly approving the four-member committee as requested by Ingalsbe and Conley. Additionally, the court offered no reason why the committee was downsized, nor did the court address the conflict of interest concerns of the citizens.

Perhaps most telling was the absence of any comment from the Court members as to why members of the Election Board, which had been included ten years ago, were excluded from participating on the committee this year.